7.1 sec in total
511 ms
6.3 sec
260 ms
Visit nanobrowser.com now to see the best up-to-date Nanobrowser content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nanobrowser.com
Nano Browser is Fastest Safe and secure Powerful Lightweight web browser. Available for Windows, Mac, Linux, Android/iOS phones/Tabs. Download for free and try this awesome Browser now
Visit nanobrowser.comWe analyzed Nanobrowser.com page load time and found that the first response time was 511 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
nanobrowser.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value1,260 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
511 ms
565 ms
1294 ms
978 ms
713 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Nanobrowser.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Nanobrowser.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (24%)
4.7 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Nanobrowser.com main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 149.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nanobrowser images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 588.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 588.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 331.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nanobrowser.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 331.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (40%)
50
30
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nanobrowser. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nanobrowser.com
511 ms
www.nanobrowser.com
565 ms
www.nanobrowser.com
1294 ms
style.css
978 ms
menu.css
713 ms
font-awesome.min.css
950 ms
login.css
739 ms
atooltip.css
740 ms
modal.css
770 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1655 ms
star-rating.min.css
989 ms
bootstrap-social.min.css
52 ms
css
60 ms
jquery.min.js
54 ms
jquery.validate.js
1227 ms
jquery.atooltip.min.js
1022 ms
custom.js
1179 ms
star-rating.min.js
1216 ms
addthis_widget.js
59 ms
submit.png
250 ms
cancel.jpg
494 ms
logo-4.png
249 ms
nano-browser-team.png
1726 ms
best-web-browser
1282 ms
fastest-web-browser.png
1421 ms
smar-web-browser.png
1190 ms
banner_design1.png
984 ms
new_dowaload.png
739 ms
new_download_mac_btn.png
986 ms
new_linux_btn.png
1231 ms
new_desktop1.png
1233 ms
new_desktop2.png
1426 ms
new_desktop3.png
1477 ms
new_banner_browser.png
2465 ms
bottom_desktop_new1.png
1537 ms
bottom_ipad_new2.png
1655 ms
bottom_android_new3.png
1662 ms
bottom_social_storage_new4.png
1722 ms
bottom_web-maker_new5.png
1793 ms
bottom_web-maker_new6.png
1892 ms
facebook.png
1898 ms
twitter.png
1968 ms
ga.js
24 ms
sdk.js
124 ms
feedback-button.png
1926 ms
3.png
2006 ms
dosis-medium.woff
2011 ms
_ate.track.config_resp
102 ms
300lo.json
138 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2008 ms
sh.48536d49e4da3bdba54606b4.html
80 ms
194 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
166 ms
custom-messages.4aa6a4573a6cd2fe3920.js
12 ms
layers.0ee9c4d64cf5ebc35dab.js
37 ms
nanobrowser.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
nanobrowser.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
nanobrowser.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanobrowser.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Nanobrowser.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nanobrowser.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nanobrowser. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: