13.2 sec in total
3.5 sec
8.9 sec
784 ms
Visit nanopool.eu now to see the best up-to-date Nanopool content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nanopool.eu
Universität bestätigt Wirksamkeit gegen Sars2/Covid19 der nachhaltigen Oberflächenveredelung des saarländischen Herstellers nanopool.
Visit nanopool.euWe analyzed Nanopool.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 3.5 sec and then it took 9.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
nanopool.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value52.1 s
0/100
25%
Value21.6 s
0/100
10%
Value1,610 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.361
30/100
15%
Value43.1 s
0/100
10%
3536 ms
191 ms
289 ms
278 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Nanopool.eu, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Nanopool.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (33%)
6.1 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Nanopool.eu main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 157.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 456.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nanopool needs image optimization as it can save up to 456.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 853.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 853.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 560.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nanopool.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 560.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (51%)
87
43
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nanopool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.nanopool.eu
3536 ms
language-selector.css
191 ms
prettyPhoto.css
289 ms
layerslider.css
278 ms
css
26 ms
cli-style.css
224 ms
settings.css
291 ms
youtube-shortcode.css
284 ms
nggallery.css
299 ms
framework-min.css
551 ms
shutter-reloaded.css
372 ms
navigation.css
373 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
377 ms
cms-navigation.css
381 ms
style.css
1147 ms
animations.css
555 ms
media.css
560 ms
scrollGallery.css
474 ms
scrollGallery_whiteBorderDesign.css
488 ms
jquery.js
842 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
580 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
733 ms
greensock.js
738 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
577 ms
cookielawinfo.js
597 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
853 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
692 ms
shutter-reloaded.js
753 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1029 ms
mootools-core-1.3.2-full-compat.js
876 ms
scrollGallery.js
846 ms
powertools-mobile-1.1.1.js
858 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
810 ms
cookiechoices.js
674 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
680 ms
comment-reply.min.js
695 ms
modernizr-min.js
761 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
965 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
1797 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
907 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
961 ms
main.js
1369 ms
wp-embed.min.js
932 ms
sitepress.js
932 ms
ga.js
69 ms
webfont.js
61 ms
pattern9.png
129 ms
netz2.jpg
130 ms
np-logo.png
131 ms
de.png
129 ms
en.png
204 ms
Folie_13_biokompatibel_b-1.png
758 ms
reliability.png
204 ms
Folie_9_Monumente_b.png
1119 ms
Folie_10_Bohrinsel.png
662 ms
Folie_14_Lugano-3.png
481 ms
Folie_11_Silos.png
726 ms
Folie_3_Krankenhauskeime.png
668 ms
Folie_4_Reuters.png
850 ms
TV-china.jpg
764 ms
Folie_5_Green-Apple.png
1006 ms
Folie_6_Marken-1.png
936 ms
nanopool.png
861 ms
LiquiGlas.png
944 ms
die-nano-experten.png
953 ms
Bacterlon.png
1126 ms
np.png
1030 ms
Nanorepel.png
1036 ms
Folie_7_Zeitungsberichte.png
1465 ms
Lugano.jpg
1098 ms
Textil_Teppich_6708-300x200.jpg
1121 ms
WY8B2961.jpg
1128 ms
Glas_Solar.jpg
1193 ms
Kunststoff_NPAustria_3524.jpg
1208 ms
Holz_Termiten_-7242-300x200.jpg
1215 ms
overlay.png
1179 ms
css
24 ms
font-awesome.css
1094 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
icomoon.woff
1312 ms
collect
69 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
97 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
97 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
98 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
100 ms
UFoEz2uiuMypUGZL1NKoeg.ttf
221 ms
F51BEgHuR0tYHxF0bD4vwvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
222 ms
8c9q46CAcsp9TiRX9KLgZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
222 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
380 ms
yls9EYWOd496wiu7qzfgNg.ttf
223 ms
lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
222 ms
coloredbg.png
99 ms
loader.gif
97 ms
shadow-top.png
97 ms
shadow-bottom.png
96 ms
nanopool.eu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
nanopool.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
nanopool.eu SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanopool.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nanopool.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nanopool.eu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nanopool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: