Tools & Wizards About Us
nanopool.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

nanopool.org

Nanopool

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

100 ms

nanopool.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Nanopool content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nanopool.org

Ethereum Classic, ZCash, Raven, Conflux, and Monero mining pool. Stable, anonymous, user-friendy pool. PPLNS, regular payouts, low comisson.

Visit nanopool.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Nanopool.org page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nanopool.org performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nanopool.org

70 ms

nanopool.org

244 ms

bootstrap.min.css

49 ms

style.css

188 ms

jquery.min.js

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Nanopool.org, 17% (8 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (482 ms) belongs to the original domain Nanopool.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 81.2 kB (45%)

Content Size

180.3 kB

After Optimization

99.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Nanopool.org main page is 180.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 73.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 66.3 kB

  • Original 73.4 kB
  • After minification 73.3 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 55.8 kB
  • After minification 41.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nanopool needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 66 B

  • Original 51.0 kB
  • After minification 51.0 kB
  • After compression 51.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (38%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nanopool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nanopool.org

nanopool.org

70 ms

nanopool.org

nanopool.org

244 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

49 ms

style.css

style.css

188 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

43 ms

knockout-min.js

knockout-min.js

60 ms

bignumber.min.js

bignumber.min.js

56 ms

store+json2.min.js

store+json2.min.js

56 ms

FileSaver.min.js

FileSaver.min.js

55 ms

jszip.min.js

jszip.min.js

55 ms

knockout.validation.min.js

knockout.validation.min.js

68 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

59 ms

knockstrap.min.js

knockstrap.min.js

275 ms

client.js

client.js

277 ms

gettext.js

gettext.js

276 ms

claymore_generator.min.js

claymore_generator.min.js

277 ms

request.min.js

request.min.js

275 ms

app.js

app.js

359 ms

google-analytics.min.js

google-analytics.min.js

482 ms

css

css

34 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf

23 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf

28 ms

hashrate

hashrate

318 ms

activeminers

activeminers

436 ms

hashrate

hashrate

418 ms

hashrate

hashrate

364 ms

activeminers

activeminers

474 ms

hashrate

hashrate

397 ms

hashrate

hashrate

354 ms

hashrate

hashrate

325 ms

activeminers

activeminers

428 ms

hashrate

hashrate

346 ms

hashrate

hashrate

356 ms

hashrate

hashrate

342 ms

ethw-logo.png

ethw-logo.png

351 ms

etc-logo.png

etc-logo.png

204 ms

xmr-logo.png

xmr-logo.png

207 ms

rvn-logo.png

rvn-logo.png

217 ms

cfx-logo.png

cfx-logo.png

201 ms

ergo-logo2.png

ergo-logo2.png

270 ms

kas-logo.png

kas-logo.png

380 ms

iron-logo.png

iron-logo.png

390 ms

zeph-logo.png

zeph-logo.png

389 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

49 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

js

js

62 ms

Accessibility Review

nanopool.org accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

nanopool.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

nanopool.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanopool.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nanopool.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nanopool.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nanopool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: