Tools & Wizards About Us
napl.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

napl.org

N-2022-APL - Marketing Conference

Page Load Speed

16.7 sec in total

First Response

3.3 sec

Resources Loaded

13.3 sec

Page Rendered

240 ms

napl.org screenshot

About Website

Visit napl.org now to see the best up-to-date N APL content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about napl.org

Marketing Conference

Visit napl.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Napl.org page load time and found that the first response time was 3.3 sec and then it took 13.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

napl.org performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

epicomm.org

3250 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

117 ms

layerslider.css

206 ms

css

25 ms

colorbox.css

142 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Napl.org, 5% (4 requests) were made to Webfulfillment.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.6 sec) relates to the external source Epicomm.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 945.5 kB (44%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Napl.org main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 926.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 62.2 kB

  • Original 77.5 kB
  • After minification 75.0 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 67.0 kB

  • Original 926.3 kB
  • After minification 859.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. N APL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 562.4 kB

  • Original 822.8 kB
  • After minification 790.0 kB
  • After compression 260.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 562.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 253.9 kB

  • Original 324.6 kB
  • After minification 270.3 kB
  • After compression 70.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Napl.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 253.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (55%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of N APL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

epicomm.org

epicomm.org

3250 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

117 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

206 ms

css

css

25 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

142 ms

settings.css

settings.css

690 ms

thickbox.css

thickbox.css

230 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

454 ms

style.css

style.css

317 ms

icons.css

icons.css

277 ms

animate.css

animate.css

272 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

456 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

427 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

jquery.qtip.min.css

350 ms

text-hover.css

text-hover.css

385 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

551 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

455 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

714 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

680 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

571 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

523 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

593 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

711 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

915 ms

calendar.js

calendar.js

664 ms

calendar-setup.js

calendar-setup.js

781 ms

calendar_function.js

calendar_function.js

796 ms

wp_cat_rss_style.css

wp_cat_rss_style.css

782 ms

calendar-jos.css

calendar-jos.css

749 ms

color-picker.min.css

color-picker.min.css

749 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

767 ms

anti-spam-3.5.js

anti-spam-3.5.js

791 ms

thickbox.js

thickbox.js

789 ms

theme20.js

theme20.js

1044 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

877 ms

custom.js

custom.js

837 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

856 ms

jquery.qtip.min.js

jquery.qtip.min.js

1100 ms

text-hover.js

text-hover.js

912 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

890 ms

epicomm_logo_website_3.png

epicomm_logo_website_3.png

122 ms

button_community.png

button_community.png

125 ms

button_store.png

button_store.png

125 ms

button_join.png

button_join.png

122 ms

button_member.png

button_member.png

159 ms

new_epicomm_website_banner.png

new_epicomm_website_banner.png

159 ms

epicomm_website_banner_Annual_2016_inforgraphic.png

epicomm_website_banner_Annual_2016_inforgraphic.png

624 ms

Commercial-Print-Icon.jpg

Commercial-Print-Icon.jpg

333 ms

Fulfillment-Icon.png

Fulfillment-Icon.png

332 ms

Mail-Icon.png

Mail-Icon.png

326 ms

marketing-Icon.png

marketing-Icon.png

331 ms

SB_Icon.jpg

SB_Icon.jpg

330 ms

accuzip_sponsor1.png

accuzip_sponsor1.png

330 ms

canon-partner11.jpg

canon-partner11.jpg

397 ms

FastSigns.jpg

FastSigns.jpg

899 ms

hp_sponsor1.png

hp_sponsor1.png

457 ms

interlink_sponsor1.png

interlink_sponsor1.png

543 ms

Konica-Minolta11.jpg

Konica-Minolta11.jpg

401 ms

MelissaDATA.jpg

MelissaDATA.jpg

464 ms

Ricoh.jpg

Ricoh.jpg

474 ms

riso_logo.jpg

riso_logo.jpg

574 ms

Xerox11.jpg

Xerox11.jpg

549 ms

LPR.asp

LPR.asp

430 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

495 ms

Metrize-Icons.svg

Metrize-Icons.svg

8595 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

29 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

170 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

313 ms

coloredbg.png

coloredbg.png

317 ms

small_left.png

small_left.png

374 ms

small_right.png

small_right.png

469 ms

loadingAnimation.gif

loadingAnimation.gif

389 ms

lp-events.min.js

lp-events.min.js

31 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

451 ms

events.asp

events.asp

156 ms

Accessibility Review

napl.org accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

napl.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

napl.org SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Napl.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Napl.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

napl.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of N APL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: