2.8 sec in total
301 ms
2.3 sec
212 ms
Visit narratology.net now to see the best up-to-date Narratology content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about narratology.net
Visit narratology.netWe analyzed Narratology.net page load time and found that the first response time was 301 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
narratology.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value3.8 s
54/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.065
97/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
301 ms
190 ms
193 ms
190 ms
195 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Narratology.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Narratology.net.
Page size can be reduced by 133.9 kB (69%)
195.2 kB
61.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Narratology.net main page is 195.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 102.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Narratology images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 35.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Narratology.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 84.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (90%)
51
5
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Narratology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
narratology.net
301 ms
node.css
190 ms
defaults.css
193 ms
system.css
190 ms
system-menus.css
195 ms
user.css
300 ms
content-module.css
301 ms
ctools.css
377 ms
date.css
378 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
400 ms
jquery.timeentry.css
409 ms
views.css
499 ms
printlinks.css
500 ms
ui.all.css
579 ms
base.css
597 ms
basemod.css
598 ms
basemod_drupal.css
619 ms
basemod_gfxborder.css
684 ms
nav_slidingdoor.css
698 ms
nav_vlist_drupal.css
768 ms
content.css
782 ms
print_003.css
797 ms
print_drupal.css
804 ms
enn.css
870 ms
jquery.js
1003 ms
drupal.js
965 ms
spamspan.compressed.js
981 ms
jquery-ui-1.7.3.custom.min.js
1028 ms
ui.core.js
1007 ms
ui.base.css
488 ms
ui.theme.css
673 ms
ui.core.css
138 ms
ui.resizable.css
189 ms
ui.accordion.css
192 ms
ui.dialog.css
191 ms
ui.slider.css
250 ms
ui.tabs.css
359 ms
ui.datepicker.css
371 ms
ui.progressbar.css
407 ms
border_left.gif
190 ms
border_top.gif
192 ms
corner_ul.gif
192 ms
corner_ur.gif
204 ms
border_right.gif
291 ms
yaml_3col_standard_enn_logo.gif
301 ms
menu-leaf.png
379 ms
menu-collapsed.png
391 ms
powered-blue-80x15.png
389 ms
ga.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
228 ms
border_bottom.gif
336 ms
corner_bl.gif
418 ms
corner_br.gif
441 ms
narratology.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
narratology.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
narratology.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Narratology.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Narratology.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
narratology.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Narratology. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: