Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

8 sec in total

First Response

297 ms

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

873 ms

natebal.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to natebal.com homepage info - get ready to check Natebal best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about natebal.com

Better blogging tips, search engine optimization advice, web design tutorials and tech news.

Visit natebal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Natebal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 297 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

natebal.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value32.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.107

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

natebal.com

297 ms

1493 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

239 ms

opinionstage-style-common.css

153 ms

opinionstage-font.css

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Natebal.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Natebal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (50%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Natebal.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 819.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 94.8 kB

  • Original 117.1 kB
  • After minification 111.2 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 681.7 kB
  • After minification 664.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Natebal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 468.7 kB

  • Original 750.7 kB
  • After minification 742.5 kB
  • After compression 282.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 468.7 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 603.5 kB

  • Original 819.5 kB
  • After minification 790.1 kB
  • After compression 216.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Natebal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 603.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (60%)

Requests Now

91

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Natebal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

natebal.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

natebal.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

natebal.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Natebal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Natebal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Natebal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: