Tools & Wizards About Us
natter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

natter.com

Natter | Come and have a natter online

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

95 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

159 ms

natter.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to natter.com homepage info - get ready to check Natter best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about natter.com

If you're feeling bored, stuck at home or lonely then Natter is the the UK's site for online chatting to establish new friemdships and relationships. So what you waiting for? Join and have a Natter on...

Visit natter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Natter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

natter.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

natter.com

95 ms

application-ada1837972552855abfcbb2ee5ea4719c015240739efe8adbdba4aaea9d16f32.css

84 ms

application-1e889df8f4101fa184e1abecf6bc6c79052ffcfd4a8c749f7986bf51fe6e0e5e.js

136 ms

css

77 ms

link_texting.min.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Natter.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net and 8% (6 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (876 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (79%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

715.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Natter.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 242.4 kB

  • Original 272.5 kB
  • After minification 271.5 kB
  • After compression 30.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 242.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 41.5 kB

  • Original 240.2 kB
  • After minification 198.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Natter needs image optimization as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB
  • After compression 447.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 602.3 kB

  • Original 641.4 kB
  • After minification 223.1 kB
  • After compression 39.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Natter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 602.3 kB or 94% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (68%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Natter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

natter.com

natter.com

95 ms

application-ada1837972552855abfcbb2ee5ea4719c015240739efe8adbdba4aaea9d16f32.css

application-ada1837972552855abfcbb2ee5ea4719c015240739efe8adbdba4aaea9d16f32.css

84 ms

application-1e889df8f4101fa184e1abecf6bc6c79052ffcfd4a8c749f7986bf51fe6e0e5e.js

application-1e889df8f4101fa184e1abecf6bc6c79052ffcfd4a8c749f7986bf51fe6e0e5e.js

136 ms

css

css

77 ms

link_texting.min.css

link_texting.min.css

56 ms

link_texting.min.js

link_texting.min.js

64 ms

ga.js

ga.js

205 ms

shareaholic.js

shareaholic.js

177 ms

fbds.js

fbds.js

451 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

375 ms

flags.png

flags.png

201 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

62 ms

phones-fb78d39291274930aa935fa1283564fbb270292d7e5bebcc2a6fefba691e0b8b.png

phones-fb78d39291274930aa935fa1283564fbb270292d7e5bebcc2a6fefba691e0b8b.png

110 ms

natter_trans_inv-307cde3426ee36cd961fa70a6997e90ada47304583a838d370db7cf4439214a8.png

natter_trans_inv-307cde3426ee36cd961fa70a6997e90ada47304583a838d370db7cf4439214a8.png

104 ms

app_store-25178aeef6eb6b83b96f5f2d004eda3bffbb37122de64afbaef7107b384a4132.svg

app_store-25178aeef6eb6b83b96f5f2d004eda3bffbb37122de64afbaef7107b384a4132.svg

98 ms

play_store-882b8e5e9ea50452c43c46cafa29d8cef4093c62572dd62c8cfedbf1f2d1044a.png

play_store-882b8e5e9ea50452c43c46cafa29d8cef4093c62572dd62c8cfedbf1f2d1044a.png

107 ms

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf

245 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf

265 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

289 ms

_r

_r

265 ms

all.js

all.js

876 ms

shrMain.min.js

shrMain.min.js

77 ms

ef66780daa55ff812f7cac39429c6e55.json

ef66780daa55ff812f7cac39429c6e55.json

196 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

79 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

143 ms

open

open

499 ms

button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js

button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js

42 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

121 ms

424 ms

pageview.gif

pageview.gif

45 ms

partners.js

partners.js

24 ms

follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html

follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html

56 ms

sholic.js

sholic.js

104 ms

usermatch

usermatch

253 ms

beacon.js

beacon.js

48 ms

cms-sh2c.html

cms-sh2c.html

157 ms

eexelate.js

eexelate.js

20 ms

143 ms

ep

ep

103 ms

jot

jot

100 ms

ping_match.gif

ping_match.gif

29 ms

62 ms

2964

2964

75 ms

net.php

net.php

24 ms

ep

ep

51 ms

usermatch

usermatch

131 ms

generic

generic

34 ms

pixel

pixel

27 ms

pixel

pixel

33 ms

pixel

pixel

24 ms

generic

generic

10 ms

match-result

match-result

68 ms

cm

cm

198 ms

usersync.aspx

usersync.aspx

172 ms

VtTWhMAoJEIAAAkZHGEAAABV%26117

VtTWhMAoJEIAAAkZHGEAAABV%26117

206 ms

i.gif

i.gif

211 ms

164 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

468 ms

crum

crum

169 ms

crum

crum

221 ms

rs

rs

43 ms

crum

crum

208 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

95 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

84 ms

epx.gif

epx.gif

79 ms

rum

rum

158 ms

cfcm.ashx

cfcm.ashx

16 ms

crum

crum

148 ms

47154.gif

47154.gif

8 ms

rum

rum

151 ms

xrefid.xgi

xrefid.xgi

6 ms

utils.js

utils.js

25 ms

23 ms

like.php

like.php

195 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

137 ms

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

481 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

542 ms

Accessibility Review

natter.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

natter.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

natter.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Natter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Natter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

natter.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Natter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: