10.9 sec in total
403 ms
9.8 sec
726 ms
Visit navalium.com now to see the best up-to-date NAVALIUM content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about navalium.com
Visit navalium.comWe analyzed Navalium.com page load time and found that the first response time was 403 ms and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
navalium.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value30.9 s
0/100
25%
Value40.0 s
0/100
10%
Value1,570 ms
13/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value28.7 s
0/100
10%
403 ms
2866 ms
106 ms
48 ms
148 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Navalium.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Navalium.com.
Page size can be reduced by 440.8 kB (8%)
5.7 MB
5.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Navalium.com main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 243.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NAVALIUM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Navalium.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.8 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (75%)
102
25
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NAVALIUM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
navalium.com
403 ms
navalium.com
2866 ms
js
106 ms
css
48 ms
font-awesome.min.css
148 ms
animate.css
272 ms
slick.css
393 ms
loaders.css
531 ms
priority-nav-core.css
396 ms
hover.css
399 ms
pagination.css
400 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
405 ms
style.min.css
657 ms
extendify-utilities.css
535 ms
styles.css
537 ms
style.css
795 ms
css
43 ms
base.css
537 ms
skeleton.css
664 ms
animsition.min.css
661 ms
font-awesome.css
665 ms
ionicons.css
671 ms
simple-line-icons.css
786 ms
pe-icon-7-stroke.css
805 ms
superfish.css
805 ms
owl.carousel.css
806 ms
owl.transitions.css
807 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
918 ms
retina.css
930 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
927 ms
bootstraps.css
924 ms
woocommerce.css
930 ms
style.css
935 ms
style.css
1049 ms
js_composer.min.css
1322 ms
core.css
1191 ms
wpglobus.css
1061 ms
lazysizes.js
1063 ms
jquery.min.js
1206 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1179 ms
js
69 ms
js
133 ms
css
33 ms
css
37 ms
vc_carousel.min.css
1201 ms
css
13 ms
js
77 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
rs6.css
1233 ms
collect
13 ms
modernizr.custom.js
1052 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
987 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
985 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
983 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
1061 ms
jquery.mobile-menu.js
1061 ms
utils.min.js
933 ms
index.js
1020 ms
index.js
1021 ms
rbtools.min.js
1229 ms
rs6.min.js
1590 ms
jquery.animsition.min.js
987 ms
retina-1.1.0.min.js
991 ms
jquery.easing.js
985 ms
superfish.js
981 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
967 ms
masonry.js
951 ms
isotope.pkgd.js
951 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
950 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
1058 ms
waypoints.min.js
1061 ms
visible.min.js
957 ms
typed.js
950 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
950 ms
classie.js
1067 ms
cbpAnimatedHeader.min.js
1068 ms
custom.js
1074 ms
wpglobus.min.js
1005 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
992 ms
transition.min.js
1066 ms
vc_carousel.min.js
950 ms
js
91 ms
navalium-web-red-white-logo-1.png
922 ms
us.png
691 ms
tr.png
691 ms
dummy.png
779 ms
kiran-holding.png
1169 ms
noya.png
1054 ms
karpowership.png
928 ms
maersk-visible-scm-b2c-europe-1.jpg
1189 ms
Hyundai_Heavy_Industries.jpg
3884 ms
iso-navalium-1024x1024.png
1447 ms
rina-navalium-1024x1024.png
1062 ms
font
85 ms
font
87 ms
font
90 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1373 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1396 ms
footer-image.jpg
2650 ms
Mechanical-Repair-Hatch-Maintenance.jpg
1677 ms
Ship-Software-Solutions.png
4811 ms
engineering.jpg
1814 ms
maritime-navigation-instruments.jpg
1693 ms
font
61 ms
font
62 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.woff
1707 ms
project-management.jpg
2249 ms
ship-steering-wheel-deck-sailing-ship-sunset.jpg
2092 ms
navalium.com
3674 ms
navalium.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
navalium.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
navalium.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Navalium.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Navalium.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
navalium.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NAVALIUM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: