4.9 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.2 sec
477 ms
Click here to check amazing Netfactor content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about netfactor.com
VisitorTrack's predictive marketing IDs anonymous web visitors and B2B intent to show you who is visiting your site and key topics they've been researching
Visit netfactor.comWe analyzed Netfactor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
netfactor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value2,650 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value17.6 s
4/100
10%
1215 ms
13 ms
130 ms
329 ms
200 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Netfactor.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Code.visitor-track.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Netfactor.com.
Page size can be reduced by 844.4 kB (39%)
2.2 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Netfactor.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Netfactor needs image optimization as it can save up to 146.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 393.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 393.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 273.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Netfactor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 273.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (56%)
71
31
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Netfactor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
netfactor.com
1215 ms
font-awesome.min.css
13 ms
style.css
130 ms
bootstrap.min.css
329 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
200 ms
gallery.prefixed.css
134 ms
css
26 ms
styles.css
132 ms
style.css
133 ms
styles.css
191 ms
style.css
205 ms
bootstrap.css
1391 ms
style.css
263 ms
filtrify.css
258 ms
frontend.css
265 ms
genericons.css
347 ms
jetpack.css
388 ms
jquery.js
517 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
345 ms
wonderplugincarouselskins.js
391 ms
wonderplugincarousel.js
536 ms
bootstrap.min.js
463 ms
scripts.js
457 ms
modernizr.full.min.js
454 ms
filtrify.min.js
521 ms
js
50 ms
maps.js
523 ms
conversion.js
18 ms
flipcarousel.css
478 ms
jquery.flipster.css
528 ms
jquery.form.min.js
534 ms
scripts.js
536 ms
script.js
543 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
55 ms
modernizr.custom.49511.js
547 ms
jquery.flipster.min.js
591 ms
coverflow_init.min.js
597 ms
count.js
597 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
328 ms
tracking.js
78 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
logo.jpg
204 ms
header.jpg
204 ms
sales.png
139 ms
marketing.png
87 ms
c-suite.png
87 ms
agency.png
149 ms
VisitorTrack-TriggersV2-800x511.png
510 ms
check.png
153 ms
VT-Report_Page_V2-800x511.png
394 ms
VT-Main_Screen-800x511.png
408 ms
Company-PageV6-800x511.png
353 ms
VT-Report-Contacts-800x511.png
332 ms
8x8.png
284 ms
behavior.png
329 ms
automated.png
395 ms
cmmc.png
398 ms
regency.png
419 ms
viawest.png
456 ms
lead.png
656 ms
vid.png
591 ms
Digital-Body-Lanquage-Thumbnail.jpg
474 ms
Formless-Gen-Thumbnail.jpg
489 ms
linkedin1.png
522 ms
twitter1.png
541 ms
google-1.png
556 ms
youtube1.png
574 ms
VisitorTrack.js
145 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
64 ms
script_data.js
135 ms
ga-audiences
41 ms
vt.aspx
107 ms
98 ms
count.js
70 ms
17 ms
netfactor.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
netfactor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
netfactor.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Netfactor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Netfactor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
netfactor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Netfactor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: