Tools & Wizards About Us
newleftreview.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

newleftreview.org

NLR 145, January–February 2024

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

522 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

215 ms

newleftreview.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Newleftreview content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about newleftreview.org

NLR 145, January–February 2024. Includes articles by Kohei Saito, Nick Burns, Peter Osborne, Michael Mann, Göran Therborn, Lorna Finlayson, Jiwei Xiao, Terry Eagleton, Jacob Collins and Rob Lucas

Visit newleftreview.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Newleftreview.org page load time and found that the first response time was 522 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

newleftreview.org performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

newleftreview.org

522 ms

reset-min.css

165 ms

general.css

174 ms

nlr.css

178 ms

issue-specific.css

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Newleftreview.org, 11% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (522 ms) belongs to the original domain Newleftreview.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 457.7 kB (80%)

Content Size

571.6 kB

After Optimization

114.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Newleftreview.org main page is 571.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 373.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 146.2 kB

  • Original 160.5 kB
  • After minification 102.1 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 58.4 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.2 kB or 91% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 281.9 kB

  • Original 373.2 kB
  • After minification 294.3 kB
  • After compression 91.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 281.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 29.5 kB

  • Original 38.0 kB
  • After minification 28.7 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Newleftreview.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (68%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Newleftreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

newleftreview.org

newleftreview.org

522 ms

reset-min.css

reset-min.css

165 ms

general.css

general.css

174 ms

nlr.css

nlr.css

178 ms

issue-specific.css

issue-specific.css

180 ms

prototip.css

prototip.css

191 ms

modalbox.css

modalbox.css

196 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

351 ms

prototip.js

prototip.js

259 ms

scriptaculous.js

scriptaculous.js

259 ms

universal.js

universal.js

270 ms

cufon.js

cufon.js

290 ms

Scala_Sans_400.font-unlimited.js

Scala_Sans_400.font-unlimited.js

294 ms

modalbox.js

modalbox.js

344 ms

styles.js

styles.js

87 ms

builder.js

builder.js

87 ms

effects.js

effects.js

96 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

74 ms

NLR96letters.gif

NLR96letters.gif

94 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

94 ms

arrow_closed.gif

arrow_closed.gif

101 ms

magnifying_glass.gif

magnifying_glass.gif

101 ms

NLR96cover.gif

NLR96cover.gif

173 ms

ecommerce.js

ecommerce.js

9 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

collect

collect

69 ms

print.css

print.css

88 ms

Accessibility Review

newleftreview.org accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

newleftreview.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

newleftreview.org SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Newleftreview.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Newleftreview.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

newleftreview.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Newleftreview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: