Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

next-line.eu

Онлайн каталог за Авточасти и Едрогабаритни части виж цени!

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

269 ms

next-line.eu screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Next Line content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about next-line.eu

Купи авточасти в интернет – магазин Next-Line може да ползвате каталог за авточасти. Оригининални и алтернатични авточасти и едрогабаритни части в наличие и на поръчка: европейски, японские и корески ...

Visit next-line.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Next-line.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

next-line.eu performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

next-line.eu

1514 ms

stylesheet.css

448 ms

slideshow.css

323 ms

carousel.css

332 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

815 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Next-line.eu, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Next-line.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 389.2 kB (51%)

Content Size

768.5 kB

After Optimization

379.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Next-line.eu main page is 768.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 389.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 31.6 kB

  • Original 36.9 kB
  • After minification 32.5 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 22.8 kB

  • Original 271.9 kB
  • After minification 249.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Next Line images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 274.5 kB

  • Original 389.2 kB
  • After minification 381.8 kB
  • After compression 114.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 274.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 60.3 kB

  • Original 70.5 kB
  • After minification 54.6 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Next-line.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (26%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Next Line. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

next-line.eu SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    BG

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Next-line.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Bulgarian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Next-line.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Next Line. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: