Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

nextivafax.com

Nextiva Fax: Online Faxing Starting at $9.95 | Get Started

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

370 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

284 ms

nextivafax.com screenshot

About Website

Visit nextivafax.com now to see the best up-to-date Nextiva Fax content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nextivafax.com

Get faxes to your inbox of choice with Nextiva's online faxing service. Secure, convenient, easy to use — start your free trial inside.

Visit nextivafax.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nextivafax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 370 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nextivafax.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nextivafax.com

370 ms

nextiva-style-2015.css

114 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

302 ms

inpage_linkid.js

117 ms

dc.js

238 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Nextivafax.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (517 ms) belongs to the original domain Nextivafax.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 184.7 kB (33%)

Content Size

558.4 kB

After Optimization

373.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Nextivafax.com main page is 558.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 277.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 30.2 kB
  • After minification 27.9 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 277.6 kB
  • After minification 277.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nextiva Fax images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 135.7 kB

  • Original 218.9 kB
  • After minification 218.9 kB
  • After compression 83.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.7 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 25.5 kB

  • Original 31.6 kB
  • After minification 30.0 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nextivafax.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (13%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

62

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nextiva Fax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

nextivafax.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nextivafax.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nextivafax.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nextivafax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nextivafax.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nextiva Fax. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: