Tools & Wizards About Us
nicereload.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 42

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

nicereload.net

澳港联盟-资料免费精选

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

163 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

396 ms

nicereload.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to nicereload.net homepage info - get ready to check Nicereload best content right away, or after learning these important things about nicereload.net

澳港联盟成立于2004年，是一家集电子主板设计开发、澳港联盟、应用软件开发、业务解决方案销售及服务于一体的高新技术企业。

Visit nicereload.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Nicereload.net page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nicereload.net performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.585

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nicereload.net

163 ms

www.nicereload.net

923 ms

style.css

12 ms

jquery1.42.min.js

23 ms

jquery.SuperSlide.2.1.js

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Nicereload.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Sdk.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (923 ms) belongs to the original domain Nicereload.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83.7 kB (2%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nicereload.net main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 24.0 kB

  • Original 30.1 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 58.3 kB

  • Original 4.5 MB
  • After minification 4.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nicereload images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 5.2 kB
  • After minification 5.2 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nicereload.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (9%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

49

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nicereload. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nicereload.net

nicereload.net

163 ms

www.nicereload.net

www.nicereload.net

923 ms

style.css

style.css

12 ms

jquery1.42.min.js

jquery1.42.min.js

23 ms

jquery.SuperSlide.2.1.js

jquery.SuperSlide.2.1.js

20 ms

DD_belatedPNG.js

DD_belatedPNG.js

33 ms

base.js

base.js

33 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

13 ms

js.js

js.js

34 ms

ewm.jpg

ewm.jpg

21 ms

icon3.png

icon3.png

22 ms

logo.png

logo.png

25 ms

5141827133.jpg

5141827133.jpg

23 ms

21171141158.jpg

21171141158.jpg

23 ms

2117958802.jpg

2117958802.jpg

24 ms

2117758353.jpg

2117758353.jpg

25 ms

2117115900.jpg

2117115900.jpg

55 ms

229815686.jpg

229815686.jpg

55 ms

21164541779.jpg

21164541779.jpg

54 ms

5143224586.jpg

5143224586.jpg

56 ms

2117216292.jpg

2117216292.jpg

57 ms

21171938155.jpg

21171938155.jpg

56 ms

21171812299.jpg

21171812299.jpg

58 ms

21171631897.jpg

21171631897.jpg

58 ms

2117243334.jpg

2117243334.jpg

58 ms

5143725138.jpg

5143725138.jpg

58 ms

1685138191.jpg

1685138191.jpg

59 ms

81071765.png

81071765.png

60 ms

contact.jpg

contact.jpg

62 ms

foot1.jpg

foot1.jpg

61 ms

710229237.png

710229237.png

63 ms

2583230785.jpg

2583230785.jpg

71 ms

fixCont.png

fixCont.png

45 ms

but.png

but.png

43 ms

topbg.jpg

topbg.jpg

53 ms

x.jpg

x.jpg

53 ms

index.html

index.html

403 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

22 ms

banner4.jpg

banner4.jpg

21 ms

banner6.jpg

banner6.jpg

41 ms

banner3.jpg

banner3.jpg

40 ms

bg1.png

bg1.png

25 ms

phone.png

phone.png

24 ms

more1.png

more1.png

25 ms

syqy.png

syqy.png

23 ms

bg2.jpg

bg2.jpg

18 ms

news2.png

news2.png

18 ms

js-sdk-pro.min.js

js-sdk-pro.min.js

912 ms

index.css

index.css

13 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

10 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

15 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

16 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

12 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

10 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

16 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

22 ms

Accessibility Review

nicereload.net accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

nicereload.net best practices score

42

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

nicereload.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nicereload.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nicereload.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nicereload.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nicereload. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: