1.4 sec in total
165 ms
1.1 sec
134 ms
Welcome to nostalgic.net homepage info - get ready to check Nostalgic best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about nostalgic.net
Research and identify American made vintage and antique bicycles from the 1880's through the 1980's.
Visit nostalgic.netWe analyzed Nostalgic.net page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
nostalgic.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value2,460 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.455
20/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
165 ms
307 ms
15 ms
63 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Nostalgic.net, 19% (8 requests) were made to Google.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (309 ms) belongs to the original domain Nostalgic.net.
Page size can be reduced by 502.1 kB (51%)
977.3 kB
475.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Nostalgic.net main page is 977.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 718.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nostalgic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 389.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.3 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nostalgic.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (65%)
40
14
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nostalgic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nostalgic.net
165 ms
www.nostalgic.net
307 ms
css
15 ms
wgs.css
63 ms
wgs2.css
124 ms
widget.css
125 ms
style.css
125 ms
style-mobile.min.css
126 ms
style-weaverii.css
136 ms
ssbp.min.css
136 ms
jquery.js
309 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
185 ms
adsbygoogle.js
4 ms
google_cse_v2.js
185 ms
ssbp_lazy_tracking.min.js
186 ms
postviews-cache.js
201 ms
weaverjslib.min.js
247 ms
wp-embed.min.js
247 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
210 ms
style.min.css
151 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
2015-logo2.jpg
185 ms
Nate-Pense-Streamliner-1-200x133.jpg
65 ms
1919-Flying-Merkel-1-200x155.jpg
65 ms
DSC_0525-Copy-200x133.jpg
73 ms
joinusonfacebook.jpg
124 ms
ca-pub-8323416400378694.js
36 ms
zrt_lookup.html
89 ms
show_ads_impl.js
40 ms
Ek_R6ngmT59El5kpkoxOePesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
10 ms
cse.js
89 ms
collect
87 ms
ads
189 ms
osd.js
9 ms
jsapi
34 ms
default+en.css
3 ms
default.css
42 ms
default+en.I.js
10 ms
async-ads.js
61 ms
googlelogo_lightgrey_46x16dp.png
63 ms
googlelogo_grey_46x15dp.png
33 ms
search_box_icon.png
34 ms
clear.png
34 ms
nostalgic.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
nostalgic.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
nostalgic.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nostalgic.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nostalgic.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nostalgic.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nostalgic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: