Tools & Wizards About Us
notepad.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

notepad.com

notepad.com is for sale | www.oxley.com

Page Load Speed

944 ms in total

First Response

85 ms

Resources Loaded

311 ms

Page Rendered

548 ms

notepad.com screenshot

About Website

Visit notepad.com now to see the best up-to-date Notepad content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about notepad.com

This premium domain name is available for purchase!

Visit notepad.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Notepad.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 859 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

notepad.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

notepad.com

85 ms

e548fb5278cde161b9c6fa492f8b8728.css

14 ms

JustZIPit_sshot_sm.gif

31 ms

tiny-tag-left.gif

28 ms

download.gif

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Notepad.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (153 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 208.5 kB (65%)

Content Size

323.1 kB

After Optimization

114.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Notepad.com main page is 323.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 193.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 24.0 kB
  • After minification 22.0 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 142.2 kB

  • Original 193.4 kB
  • After minification 51.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Notepad needs image optimization as it can save up to 142.2 kB or 74% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 49.1 kB

  • Original 71.3 kB
  • After minification 50.3 kB
  • After compression 22.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.1 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 34.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (54%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Notepad. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

notepad.com

notepad.com

85 ms

e548fb5278cde161b9c6fa492f8b8728.css

e548fb5278cde161b9c6fa492f8b8728.css

14 ms

JustZIPit_sshot_sm.gif

JustZIPit_sshot_sm.gif

31 ms

tiny-tag-left.gif

tiny-tag-left.gif

28 ms

download.gif

download.gif

29 ms

html-help-toy_sshot.gif

html-help-toy_sshot.gif

59 ms

html-email.gif

html-email.gif

58 ms

web-keyword-server_sshot.gif

web-keyword-server_sshot.gif

60 ms

search_sshot.gif

search_sshot.gif

68 ms

html_editor.gif

html_editor.gif

29 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

28 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

59 ms

drupal.js

drupal.js

67 ms

fivestar.js

fivestar.js

70 ms

dhtml_menu.js

dhtml_menu.js

72 ms

jstools.js

jstools.js

80 ms

collapsiblock.js

collapsiblock.js

81 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

69 ms

jquery.tabs.pack.js

jquery.tabs.pack.js

70 ms

jquery.history_remote.pack.js

jquery.history_remote.pack.js

71 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

72 ms

nice_menus.js

nice_menus.js

73 ms

poormanscron.js

poormanscron.js

73 ms

seo_dashboard_monitor.js

seo_dashboard_monitor.js

77 ms

spamspan.compressed.js

spamspan.compressed.js

75 ms

firebug.gif

firebug.gif

85 ms

bg.png

bg.png

60 ms

header.png

header.png

79 ms

bg-primary-1.gif

bg-primary-1.gif

70 ms

bg-primary-3.gif

bg-primary-3.gif

71 ms

bg-input.png

bg-input.png

78 ms

html-guide-sshot_tear.gif

html-guide-sshot_tear.gif

70 ms

feed.png

feed.png

71 ms

ca-pub-6897500374933582.js

ca-pub-6897500374933582.js

153 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

65 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

65 ms

sidebar.png

sidebar.png

53 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

47 ms

ads

ads

20 ms

osd.js

osd.js

4 ms

small_delete.png

small_delete.png

4 ms

small_star.png

small_star.png

4 ms

Accessibility Review

notepad.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

notepad.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

notepad.com SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Notepad.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Notepad.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

notepad.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Notepad. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: