Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    61% of websites

nutrixeal.net

Compléments nutritionnels français de haute qualité

Page Load Speed

8.5 sec in total

First Response

308 ms

Resources Loaded

7.3 sec

Page Rendered

927 ms

nutrixeal.net screenshot

About Website

Visit nutrixeal.net now to see the best up-to-date Nutrixeal content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nutrixeal.net

Nutrixeal est un laboratoire nutraceutique, à la pointe de l'innovation galénique, compléments alimentaires premium, sans excipient.

Visit nutrixeal.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Nutrixeal.net page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nutrixeal.net performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value690 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value2.064

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nutrixeal.net

308 ms

www.nutrixeal.fr

647 ms

shared.css

140 ms

bootstrap-grid.css

172 ms

style.css

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 171 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Nutrixeal.net, 90% (154 requests) were made to Nutrixeal.fr and 3% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Nutrixeal.fr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 234.2 kB (5%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Nutrixeal.net main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 77.2 kB

  • Original 97.1 kB
  • After minification 93.9 kB
  • After compression 19.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 87.3 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nutrixeal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 46.6 kB

  • Original 226.4 kB
  • After minification 226.2 kB
  • After compression 179.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 102.1 kB
  • After minification 102.0 kB
  • After compression 79.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nutrixeal.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 92 (55%)

Requests Now

166

After Optimization

74

The browser has sent 166 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nutrixeal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

nutrixeal.net accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nutrixeal.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

nutrixeal.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nutrixeal.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is French. Our system also found out that Nutrixeal.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nutrixeal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: