3.6 sec in total
758 ms
2.4 sec
399 ms
Click here to check amazing Intqhc Oxfordjournals content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intqhc.oxfordjournals.org
Visit intqhc.oxfordjournals.orgWe analyzed Intqhc.oxfordjournals.org page load time and found that the first response time was 758 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
intqhc.oxfordjournals.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value3,290 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.45
20/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
758 ms
103 ms
106 ms
109 ms
102 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Intqhc.oxfordjournals.org, 68% (50 requests) were made to Dc67k423myy0n.cloudfront.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Oxfordjournals.org.
Page size can be reduced by 825.9 kB (68%)
1.2 MB
397.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Intqhc.oxfordjournals.org main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 606.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intqhc Oxfordjournals images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 460.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 460.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 270.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intqhc.oxfordjournals.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 270.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (60%)
72
29
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intqhc Oxfordjournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intqhc.oxfordjournals.org
758 ms
css_SAHxSkj-2Dj7VXH2JUL34nHgS40Fa0LanVF31yjgvBI.css
103 ms
css_1teVpMZ8bj6rnLswPJ-pm_NtfKhcMRnnOOn2L2Udbmc.css
106 ms
css_LAv6GPvJS7_BmayT4gPMuTWYfNk-lba7-YZlLHNHmL8.css
109 ms
css_1SB9LqGeFhcH9iVnL101TrN0I3y8i7gN6R_22_ftIjw.css
102 ms
css_7yZIWn2kVrX-iU87vbx59zBpfQYlc7DocA9WQv41-KY_highwire.style.highwire.css.css
109 ms
css_Wq-4zkYaIDNS63Jwf-f_lUrzAfHxUAeq_34Y902zaZo.css
249 ms
css_IowgQz0NAh1JsRJU2bwQtcyBm2KyYZfb8iOdXv91_fE.css
245 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4_1_mobile.css
61 ms
css_6untXdACFtwmf_K31hz79kSQDq_0xTzIDWAuz2ALI_A.css
246 ms
css_M8W2RkjSWY5bUOpVa6FCmbVnX-X1smbg2vR1mMLbYTE.css
111 ms
css_qjtGKGIfFZ5WY-PnBoQqUNQH6nUV7HstFCxxn6VJSQ8.css
108 ms
modernizr.min.js
127 ms
jquery.min.js
147 ms
js_3TykeRWpejhD4-J3vdlaNXdULg9xhOZhbsppK0o2bUs.js
125 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
169 ms
js_wevU43hGwJGWikf57U7OtrP1QrWxGPm7wQOafZf6KaY.js
305 ms
js_Sh2UgvOvuSU9-K8qwk3-2k4jaFfLVCvAG5OTqQOumXM.js
128 ms
js_CDVzT3whzGfEXzEne_F7K8qqDiVtt8anD1lhOzOui5c.js
133 ms
lightbox.js
141 ms
js_0ya4tpszt-XnmsJXakNq2o6V2_VkgtsHaCL3VA7cXZY.js
308 ms
mobile_main.js
958 ms
caturls.js
1164 ms
js_XTqr5tImv-y1YE6uX3sZjErNpvbgsHSHHMcJ4W5LJwI.js
170 ms
highwire_math_inline.js
196 ms
highwire_math.js
194 ms
MathJax.js
81 ms
js_OYo_fEQEN1Q3gdchGXSB-OVPEmawsYa5peyjOjneVd0.js
377 ms
js_uWwWqDJdceCGFlgcEr35F4rgcA3jZT1fJIMIeOeQZ2I.js
299 ms
js_uwrfBOJCFVq42muTMjrq2bD-RUh8NNq_fZRTb6dsNb4.js
299 ms
oup.cookiepolicy.pack.js
21 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
collect
14 ms
TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML.js
182 ms
logo.svg
176 ms
INTQHC-IF-logo-update.png
349 ms
cope-logo.gif
207 ms
email_alerts.jpg
279 ms
developing-countries-initiative.jpg
286 ms
right_grey.svg
161 ms
minimise.svg
158 ms
1.cover-source.jpg
157 ms
47df20848e349609ff3d256c34ac6765.gif
162 ms
3ff2a073b7c0853381b18e3471f24758.gif
163 ms
b28a426d8b4d1eea77d538fb3bf5b436.gif
163 ms
8696cd2eeff3d7cbedd1c2906218b045.gif
164 ms
dbd923d4354569801c5bd0096637e6ad.gif
189 ms
a627965e3d0373a84663146c63e4cdad.gif
274 ms
bebdf03cdf256ebbd44dade43f075860.gif
165 ms
2b66f926c1a81cda47a353cfcb8a6bd1.gif
167 ms
search.svg
165 ms
1.cover-source.jpg
168 ms
6.cover-source.jpg
169 ms
5.cover-source.jpg
169 ms
4.cover-source.jpg
169 ms
alerts.svg
174 ms
rss_orange.svg
171 ms
share.svg
173 ms
follow.svg
176 ms
facebook.svg
177 ms
twitter.svg
180 ms
twitter.svg
181 ms
facebook.svg
182 ms
loading.gif
184 ms
oup-logo.png
183 ms
ntpagetag.js
99 ms
1.js
251 ms
01-01-2000
197 ms
chevron-left.svg
127 ms
chevron-right.svg
123 ms
ntpagetag.gif
12 ms
implied
99 ms
@Top,Right2,Right1,Bottom
87 ms
intqhc.oxfordjournals.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
intqhc.oxfordjournals.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intqhc.oxfordjournals.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Intqhc.oxfordjournals.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intqhc.oxfordjournals.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intqhc Oxfordjournals. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: