Tools & Wizards About Us
olimar.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

olimar.de

Urlaub in Portugal und Südeuropa buchen | OLIMAR Reisen

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

300 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

olimar.de screenshot

About Website

Visit olimar.de now to see the best up-to-date OLIMAR content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about olimar.de

Ihr Spezialist für individuellen Urlaub in Portugal und Südeuropa. Buchen Sie bei OLIMAR Hotels ✔ Flüge ✈ Rundreisen ✔ und viele Extras online.

Visit olimar.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Olimar.de page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

olimar.de performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,030 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.olimar.de

300 ms

gtm.js

49 ms

main.tailwind.css

75 ms

main.sass.css

17 ms

bundle.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Olimar.de, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Userlike-cdn-widgets.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (678 ms) belongs to the original domain Olimar.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 491.8 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Olimar.de main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 998.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 395.5 kB

  • Original 434.9 kB
  • After minification 434.4 kB
  • After compression 39.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 395.5 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 998.8 kB
  • After minification 991.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. OLIMAR images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 88.4 kB

  • Original 121.6 kB
  • After minification 120.5 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 25 B

  • Original 68.8 kB
  • After minification 68.8 kB
  • After compression 68.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Olimar.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (13%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OLIMAR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.olimar.de

www.olimar.de

300 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

49 ms

main.tailwind.css

main.tailwind.css

75 ms

main.sass.css

main.sass.css

17 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

68 ms

16508581e53250f4e7255e4bf27cfa217b09b35fa9da7f45f02b024f8573a815.js

16508581e53250f4e7255e4bf27cfa217b09b35fa9da7f45f02b024f8573a815.js

377 ms

3f0fc03a90da21ef5ef4612a6.js

3f0fc03a90da21ef5ef4612a6.js

213 ms

OLIMAR_Logo_COLOR_2021.svg

OLIMAR_Logo_COLOR_2021.svg

153 ms

PT-Algarve-Strand-Droneview.jpg

PT-Algarve-Strand-Droneview.jpg

155 ms

1910_AEG_Stills_Shot-10_Cam-02_EXT_AirToAir_240120_2850x1920.jpg

1910_AEG_Stills_Shot-10_Cam-02_EXT_AirToAir_240120_2850x1920.jpg

42 ms

GR-Kreta-unsplash.jpg

GR-Kreta-unsplash.jpg

51 ms

IT-Sardinien-CalaBiriola-132450232-fotolia17-c-dpvue_studio.jpg

IT-Sardinien-CalaBiriola-132450232-fotolia17-c-dpvue_studio.jpg

46 ms

HR-Dalmatien-Brac-BolKloster-c-Dreamer4787-shutterstock-450091318.jpg

HR-Dalmatien-Brac-BolKloster-c-Dreamer4787-shutterstock-450091318.jpg

50 ms

ES-Valencia-JardindelTuria-VV-01661_M.jpg

ES-Valencia-JardindelTuria-VV-01661_M.jpg

76 ms

sol_miro.jpg

sol_miro.jpg

79 ms

Visit_Algarve_rbg_pos.png

Visit_Algarve_rbg_pos.png

77 ms

PT-Algarve-Allgemein-BeachStrand-c-Andre_Goncalves-shutterstock_124225972.jpg

PT-Algarve-Allgemein-BeachStrand-c-Andre_Goncalves-shutterstock_124225972.jpg

181 ms

ES-Kanaren-Fuerteventura-lSugaEw0eW4-unsplash_.jpg

ES-Kanaren-Fuerteventura-lSugaEw0eW4-unsplash_.jpg

199 ms

IT-Toskana-ClassicViewBeiPienza-c-GlebTarro-shutterstock-123133147.jpg

IT-Toskana-ClassicViewBeiPienza-c-GlebTarro-shutterstock-123133147.jpg

187 ms

HR-Krk-Panorama-c-serkat_Photography-fotolia-85529103.jpg

HR-Krk-Panorama-c-serkat_Photography-fotolia-85529103.jpg

186 ms

GR-Haus.jpg

GR-Haus.jpg

228 ms

MT-Kste-ferenc-horvath-cg78NV0c_Ow-unsplash.jpg

MT-Kste-ferenc-horvath-cg78NV0c_Ow-unsplash.jpg

184 ms

CV-Boavista-LandscapeWithBeach-c-Michel_Borges-shutterstock-250444381.jpg

CV-Boavista-LandscapeWithBeach-c-Michel_Borges-shutterstock-250444381.jpg

283 ms

PT-Algarve-Lagos-CamiloBeachSunrise-90070740-fotolia17-c-Smileus_M.jpg

PT-Algarve-Lagos-CamiloBeachSunrise-90070740-fotolia17-c-Smileus_M.jpg

292 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

290 ms

footerlogo-ssl.png

footerlogo-ssl.png

206 ms

footerlogo-fairweg.png

footerlogo-fairweg.png

304 ms

footerlogo-klimalink.png

footerlogo-klimalink.png

312 ms

footerlogo-tourcert.png

footerlogo-tourcert.png

406 ms

footer-contact.png

footer-contact.png

388 ms

footer-katalog.png

footer-katalog.png

404 ms

DRV-Mitglied-white.svg

DRV-Mitglied-white.svg

444 ms

uc.js

uc.js

36 ms

sul_sans_light-webfont.woff

sul_sans_light-webfont.woff

393 ms

sul_sans_medium-webfont.woff

sul_sans_medium-webfont.woff

460 ms

ivartext-italic-webfont.ttf

ivartext-italic-webfont.ttf

576 ms

ivartext-regular-webfont.ttf

ivartext-regular-webfont.ttf

678 ms

sul_sans_black-webfont.woff

sul_sans_black-webfont.woff

637 ms

ivartext-italic-webfont.woff

ivartext-italic-webfont.woff

115 ms

ivartext-regular-webfont.woff

ivartext-regular-webfont.woff

294 ms

Accessibility Review

olimar.de accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

olimar.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

olimar.de SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Olimar.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Olimar.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

olimar.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of OLIMAR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: