7.9 sec in total
2.1 sec
5.6 sec
175 ms
Welcome to oncamp.in homepage info - get ready to check Oncamp best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about oncamp.in
Campus Placements stats in B.Tech,M.Tech,MBA,MCA from Institutions like IITs,NITs,BITs,IIMs etc. with company names & salary offered in table and graph
Visit oncamp.inWe analyzed Oncamp.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
oncamp.in performance score
2139 ms
513 ms
733 ms
734 ms
497 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Oncamp.in, 8% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Formget.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Oncamp.in.
Page size can be reduced by 747.4 kB (61%)
1.2 MB
470.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Oncamp.in main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 532.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oncamp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 361.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 361.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 333.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oncamp.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 333.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (72%)
58
16
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oncamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oncamp.in
2139 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
513 ms
A.jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css,qver=1.11.7.pagespeed.cf.ah2w85dUZp.css
733 ms
A.jquery-ui-spinner.css,qver=1.11.7.pagespeed.cf.px8GW44t2K.css
734 ms
A.calendar-jos.css,qver=1.11.7.pagespeed.cf.A0tWdm_0zb.css
497 ms
A.intlTelInput.css,qver=1.11.7.pagespeed.cf.RardIxcbep.css
829 ms
A.form_maker_frontend.css,qver=1.11.7.pagespeed.cf.oyY3olGcM7.css
585 ms
css
36 ms
A.fm-animate.css,qver=1.11.7.pagespeed.cf.w_7oe8cr3d.css
1491 ms
A.font-awesome.css,qver=1.11.7.pagespeed.cf.NC73rkLV2Q.css
1062 ms
A.mg_popup.css,qver=4.7.5.pagespeed.cf.HyQ3bUs9Ru.css
882 ms
front-legacy.css
979 ms
A.style.css,qver=1.6.3.pagespeed.cf.zuNOYLcif4.css
1460 ms
A.font-awesome.css,qver=4.6.2.pagespeed.cf.Pu-uFM3OYm.css
1383 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
1757 ms
public.css
1229 ms
A.,qsccss=1,aver=4.7.5.pagespeed.cf.9AMFOrmDt3.css
1609 ms
jquery.js,qver=1.12.4.pagespeed.jm.pPCPAKkkss.js
1963 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js,qver=1.4.1.pagespeed.jm.C2obERNcWh.js
1665 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js,qver=1.11.7.pagespeed.jm.157eubkELS.js
1707 ms
intlTelInput.js,qver=1.11.7.pagespeed.jm.64Qmr8yv4b.js
1743 ms
calendar.js,qver==1.11.7+calendar_function.js,qver==1.11.7.pagespeed.jc.a_prFRF-n_.js
2167 ms
main_div_front_end.js,qver=1.11.7.pagespeed.jm.O2d-zujXcy.js
2227 ms
formget-contact-form,_js,_mg_front.js,qver==4.7.5+duracelltomi-google-tag-manager,_js,_gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js,qver==1.6.1.pagespeed.jc.BIHOygC7Zi.js
1958 ms
adsbygoogle.js.pagespeed.jm.JRhzZ1chzG.js
15 ms
A.flexslider.css,qver=3.5.1.pagespeed.cf.LPbkuUHY4u.css
1776 ms
wp-content,_plugins,_contact-form-7,_includes,_js,_scripts.js,qver==4.8+wp-includes,_js,_jquery,_ui,_widget.min.js,qver==1.11.4.pagespeed.jc.v7G699B3nV.js
1830 ms
core.min.js,qver=1.11.4.pagespeed.jm.kez1sYnsmB.js
1986 ms
mouse.min.js,qver==1.11.4+slider.min.js,qver==1.11.4+button.min.js,qver==1.11.4+spinner.min.js,qver==1.11.4+effect.min.js,qver==1.11.4+effect-shake.min.js,qver==1.11.4+datepicker.min.js,qver==1.11.4.pagespeed.jc.SkQhFVb-FT.js
2234 ms
wp-content,_plugins,_smooth-scroll-up,_js,_jquery.scrollUp.min.js,qver==4.7.5+wp-content,_themes,_vantage,_js,_jquery.flexslider.min.js,qver==2.1+wp-content,_themes,_vantage,_js,_jquery.touchSwipe.min.js,qver==1.6.6+wp-content,_themes,_vantage,_js,_jquery.theme-main.min.js,qver==1.6.3+wp-includes,_js,_wp-embed.min.js,qver==4.7.5.pagespeed.jc.bZ1vmM7c1E.js
2278 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js,qver=3.5.1.pagespeed.jm.nup-2USMsh.js
2791 ms
count.js,qver=4.7.5.pagespeed.jm.jUhhh7RHyO.js
2223 ms
css
14 ms
atrk.js
106 ms
gtm.js
105 ms
analytics.js
49 ms
analytics.js
100 ms
xoncamp.in-logo-2.jpg.pagespeed.ic.OOy84RSsNC.jpg
284 ms
Visiting-Companies.png.pagespeed.ce.P7zYedi9Pe.png
258 ms
xB-Tech-Placements-1.jpg.pagespeed.ic.8XMbp9RIro.jpg
765 ms
xRecent-Placements-Data-1.jpg.pagespeed.ic.uV2jOtxtkE.jpg
759 ms
PlacementsReports.png.pagespeed.ce.YDtHFiflmt.png
761 ms
xOncamp.in-homepage-2.jpg.pagespeed.ic.upz5UlB48f.jpg
761 ms
xEngineering3.jpg.pagespeed.ic.8jtKq0pXer.jpg
760 ms
xMBA3-2.jpg.pagespeed.ic.0ZJ1-10fsd.jpg
762 ms
xMCA1.jpg.pagespeed.ic.wmRRPcsjXn.jpg
762 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
967 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
971 ms
collect
46 ms
collect
46 ms
popup.js
296 ms
atrk.gif
20 ms
vantage-icons.woff
733 ms
collect
12 ms
test.png
626 ms
contact_tab
290 ms
style.css
345 ms
chat-icon.png
386 ms
close_form.png
85 ms
count.js
25 ms
count.js
16 ms
slide-indicator-active.png.pagespeed.ce.UbU45svK0x.png
284 ms
slide-indicator-inactive.png.pagespeed.ce.0yNjmTJ_4L.png
252 ms
gallery-prev.png.pagespeed.ce.h5CGqlqcqt.png
261 ms
gallery-next.png.pagespeed.ce.67MD0BbOuH.png
284 ms
oncamp.in SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oncamp.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oncamp.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oncamp.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oncamp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: