Report Summary

  • 1

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 44

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

onexcompany.com

ONEX Technologies S.A - Technology Systems & Business Solutions

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

885 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

321 ms

onexcompany.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to onexcompany.com homepage info - get ready to check ONEX Company best content right away, or after learning these important things about onexcompany.com

Welcome to ONEX Technologies S.A Technology Systems & Business Solutions site. www. Ask for our support in the wide range of our Team's expertise.

Visit onexcompany.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Onexcompany.com page load time and found that the first response time was 885 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onexcompany.com performance score

1

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,090 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.onexcompany.com

885 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

98 ms

style.min.css

194 ms

style.css

288 ms

style.min.css

293 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Onexcompany.com, 9% (9 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Onexcompany.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (9%)

Content Size

11.4 MB

After Optimization

10.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Onexcompany.com main page is 11.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 10.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 126.3 kB

  • Original 158.5 kB
  • After minification 148.2 kB
  • After compression 32.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 556.3 kB

  • Original 10.2 MB
  • After minification 9.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ONEX Company images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 33.6 kB

  • Original 451.6 kB
  • After minification 451.3 kB
  • After compression 418.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 312.7 kB

  • Original 622.3 kB
  • After minification 621.6 kB
  • After compression 309.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onexcompany.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 312.7 kB or 50% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (49%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

47

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ONEX Company. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

onexcompany.com accessibility score

44

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

onexcompany.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onexcompany.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onexcompany.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ONEX Company. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: