5.8 sec in total
487 ms
4.5 sec
793 ms
Visit onsafelines.com now to see the best up-to-date Onsafelines content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about onsafelines.com
Freeware QHSE Business Software Solutions
Visit onsafelines.comWe analyzed Onsafelines.com page load time and found that the first response time was 487 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
onsafelines.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value2.3 s
93/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value6.2 s
62/100
10%
487 ms
336 ms
729 ms
241 ms
228 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Onsafelines.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source C.statcounter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 587.9 kB (47%)
1.3 MB
675.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Onsafelines.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 608.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 186.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 186.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onsafelines images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 381.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 381.7 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onsafelines.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (19%)
91
74
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onsafelines. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
onsafelines.com
487 ms
www.onsafelines.com
336 ms
www.onsafelines.com
729 ms
wpstyles.css
241 ms
jsWPRedirect.js
228 ms
jquery.js
392 ms
jsNavBarFuncs.js
325 ms
global_navtree.js
411 ms
wp_navbar_combob.js
410 ms
addthis_widget.js
92 ms
jsMenu.js
439 ms
analytics.js
133 ms
gplus-32.png
222 ms
wp9c2f3805_00.png
122 ms
wp60cca951_00.png
129 ms
fb-findusonfacebook-online-114.png
213 ms
wp9b78f73f_00.png
119 ms
wp73b1de49_00.png
128 ms
wpa07d5fdc_00.png
1211 ms
wp5533b116.gif
230 ms
gtm.js
541 ms
counter.js
208 ms
collect
38 ms
collect
475 ms
t.php
1281 ms
wpf07b90a9_00.png
632 ms
wp2dc28d71_00.png
633 ms
wpf2a8ed0b_00.png
632 ms
wp0c384ff0_00.png
633 ms
wpa2077906_00.png
497 ms
wp690a13ec_00.png
783 ms
wp1d99bf83_00.png
781 ms
wpf15703c7_00.png
780 ms
wpa0af21ea_00.png
778 ms
wpaef2dcb9_00.png
782 ms
wp0edf8baa_00.png
776 ms
wp24ec3dad_00.png
857 ms
wpb1098c63_00.png
864 ms
wp32c06e9d_00.png
864 ms
wp1dad9e63_00.png
861 ms
wp393b8097_00.png
860 ms
wp1cfc89d3_00.png
861 ms
wpc29c9d00_00.png
961 ms
wpd8dde292_00.png
964 ms
wpa3be856d_00.png
969 ms
wp03b604dd_00.png
960 ms
wp0599beec_00.png
957 ms
wp9514d9c4_00.png
958 ms
wpc5684619_00.png
1064 ms
wp91ad4959_00.png
1068 ms
wp9d2c391c_00.png
1073 ms
wp742b61e7_00.png
1069 ms
wp67618d1a_00.png
1073 ms
wp2fce3a87_00.png
1073 ms
wp9cb58a5f_00.png
1198 ms
wp6151d615_00.png
1205 ms
wp20f3c4ba_00.png
1199 ms
wp88bb1790_00.png
1202 ms
wp92f5c76d_00.png
1203 ms
wp2728d548_00.png
1201 ms
300lo.json
366 ms
counter.edf852b124cbbd1dcd84.js
58 ms
sh.953eb77977227bfd253ee158.html
167 ms
wpe28461f6_00.png
828 ms
wpcb07aef3_00.png
829 ms
wp25dff5b4_00.png
831 ms
wp670fb16a_00.png
828 ms
wp56c2d737_00.png
832 ms
wp0ed5122a_00.png
832 ms
shares.json
84 ms
wp2aa53a84_00.png
629 ms
wpb306ad9c_00.png
635 ms
wpab03516e_00.png
635 ms
wp47cad130_00.png
634 ms
wp52deb0c3_00.png
639 ms
wp86c42845_00.png
634 ms
wpc9bfb63e_00.png
653 ms
wpe1527b4f_00.png
651 ms
wp70202414_00.png
651 ms
wp7e5fb8cf_00.png
650 ms
wp614b84a6_00.png
658 ms
wp6e0b10a2_00.png
658 ms
wp062b12e9_00.png
645 ms
wp41f56a2b_00.png
650 ms
wp58cf95c3_00.png
645 ms
wp2f9eecca_00.png
643 ms
wpa5d6ebe6_00.png
643 ms
wpbbb879d5_00.png
642 ms
wp335b9772_00.png
635 ms
wp06071388_00.png
635 ms
wpd0b95eed_00.png
635 ms
wpc9dd15e1_00.png
631 ms
wp6617a533_00.png
634 ms
wp8a223e66_00.png
633 ms
wp2fd29fdc_00.png
597 ms
wpabdcb03e_00.png
596 ms
onsafelines.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
onsafelines.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
onsafelines.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onsafelines.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onsafelines.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
onsafelines.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onsafelines. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: