4.6 sec in total
139 ms
4.1 sec
340 ms
Click here to check amazing Onward Tek content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about onwardtek.com
Expert technology solutions that give you a competitive edge and provide long-term benefits for the security and growth of your business.
Visit onwardtek.comWe analyzed Onwardtek.com page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
onwardtek.com performance score
139 ms
2831 ms
58 ms
90 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Onwardtek.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Onwardtek.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (34%)
4.0 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Onwardtek.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.8 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 204.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onward Tek images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 728.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 728.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 361.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onwardtek.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 361.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (77%)
70
16
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onward Tek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
onwardtek.com
139 ms
www.onwardtek.com
2831 ms
rokbox.css
58 ms
grid-responsive.css
90 ms
bootstrap.css
124 ms
master-b1dddad2d7fb8dd03115e509729a3c8c.css
133 ms
master-webkit.css
96 ms
demo-b1dddad2d7fb8dd03115e509729a3c8c.css
90 ms
mediaqueries.css
99 ms
menu.css
148 ms
rt_epsilon-custom.css
143 ms
tabs.css
145 ms
showcase.css
147 ms
animation.css
164 ms
jquery.min.js
214 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
173 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
182 ms
caption.js
181 ms
bootstrap.min.js
183 ms
mootools-core.js
249 ms
core.js
243 ms
mootools-more.js
333 ms
rokbox.js
271 ms
chart.js
242 ms
browser-engines.js
268 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
269 ms
headroom.js
269 ms
headroom_init.js
286 ms
scrolling-header.js
295 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
305 ms
sidemenu.js
306 ms
mootools-mobile.js
306 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
327 ms
roksprocket.js
385 ms
tabs.js
385 ms
moofx.js
387 ms
features.js
389 ms
api.js
60 ms
gcore-ui.css
388 ms
gtooltip.css
346 ms
gdropdown.css
288 ms
showcase.js
280 ms
animation.js
282 ms
jquery.js
357 ms
gtooltip.js
291 ms
gvalidation.js
300 ms
en.js
293 ms
jquery.inputmask.js
302 ms
gtabs.js
293 ms
gsliders.js
331 ms
gmodal.js
332 ms
gdropdown.js
275 ms
recaptcha__en.js
40 ms
analytics.js
84 ms
logo.png
55 ms
OnTrack.jpg
542 ms
Chicagskyline.jpg
410 ms
Cloudview.JPG
576 ms
poly.png
121 ms
gray.png
119 ms
referral_for_another_business_resized.jpg
122 ms
cloud1-2.png
226 ms
bdr1-2.png
263 ms
callphone.png
160 ms
anchor
59 ms
sourcesanspro-bold-webfont.woff
134 ms
sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff
154 ms
sourcesanspro-light-webfont.woff
199 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
235 ms
IcoMoon.svg
235 ms
sourcesanspro-semibold-webfont.woff
275 ms
collect
13 ms
styles__ltr.css
6 ms
s5G5viF55Zd620FDUE2o6cwnsrT1pToaK6kVmkloWvE.js
17 ms
webworker.js
22 ms
logo_48.png
15 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
77 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
77 ms
recaptcha__en.js
29 ms
onwardtek.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onwardtek.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onwardtek.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
onwardtek.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onward Tek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: