8.3 sec in total
893 ms
7.1 sec
261 ms
Visit oxfordediting.com now to see the best up-to-date Oxford Editing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about oxfordediting.com
Oxford Editing provides professional editing for academic authors for a competitive price and with a rapid turnaround. Our academic editing services include proofreading, copy editing, content or...
Visit oxfordediting.comWe analyzed Oxfordediting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 893 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
oxfordediting.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.8 s
0/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value13.3 s
2/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.504
16/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
893 ms
46 ms
838 ms
109 ms
109 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (97 requests) were addressed to the original Oxfordediting.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (893 ms) belongs to the original domain Oxfordediting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (78%)
2.1 MB
457.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Oxfordediting.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Oxford Editing needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 327.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 327.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oxfordediting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (92%)
93
7
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oxford Editing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 82 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oxfordediting.com
893 ms
wp-notification-bars-public.css
46 ms
6ac5a86df9068dcbced3b1f71bb22a2c.min.css
838 ms
tabs-lg-min.min.css
109 ms
min-shbp.min.css
109 ms
min-shbp-header-legacy.min.css
151 ms
min-768-max-1024-l.min.css
153 ms
min-768-max-1024-l-header-legacy.min.css
146 ms
min-sh-cbp.min.css
143 ms
jquery.min.js
231 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
190 ms
nfpluginsettings.js
187 ms
wp-notification-bars-public.js
192 ms
js
45 ms
style.css
199 ms
style.min.css
329 ms
c603169cbbbc90b838a610bd1413b045.min.js
441 ms
stylesheet.css
64 ms
oxed-logo-web1.png
151 ms
id-oxed-mobile.png
141 ms
books-stacked-crop1.jpg
83 ms
oxed-quote-btn.png
59 ms
contemporary-china-002.png
128 ms
proxima-nova-regular.woff
99 ms
proxima-nova-semibold.woff
70 ms
awb-icons.woff
44 ms
proxima-nova-italic.woff
118 ms
fullwidth-md.min.css
42 ms
fullwidth-sm.min.css
50 ms
icon-md.min.css
59 ms
icon-sm.min.css
45 ms
grid-md.min.css
43 ms
grid-sm.min.css
42 ms
image-md.min.css
46 ms
image-sm.min.css
49 ms
person-md.min.css
48 ms
person-sm.min.css
46 ms
section-separator-md.min.css
43 ms
section-separator-sm.min.css
44 ms
social-sharing-md.min.css
45 ms
social-sharing-sm.min.css
43 ms
social-links-md.min.css
43 ms
social-links-sm.min.css
41 ms
tabs-lg-max.min.css
42 ms
tabs-md.min.css
41 ms
tabs-sm.min.css
44 ms
title-md.min.css
43 ms
title-sm.min.css
37 ms
swiper-md.min.css
43 ms
swiper-sm.min.css
48 ms
post-cards-md.min.css
40 ms
post-cards-sm.min.css
41 ms
facebook-page-md.min.css
40 ms
facebook-page-sm.min.css
39 ms
twitter-timeline-md.min.css
42 ms
twitter-timeline-sm.min.css
48 ms
flickr-md.min.css
41 ms
flickr-sm.min.css
40 ms
tagcloud-md.min.css
39 ms
tagcloud-sm.min.css
40 ms
instagram-md.min.css
77 ms
instagram-sm.min.css
39 ms
meta-md.min.css
39 ms
meta-sm.min.css
46 ms
layout-columns-md.min.css
44 ms
layout-columns-sm.min.css
39 ms
max-1c.min.css
40 ms
max-2c.min.css
40 ms
min-2c-max-3c.min.css
38 ms
min-3c-max-4c.min.css
38 ms
min-4c-max-5c.min.css
40 ms
min-5c-max-6c.min.css
42 ms
max-shbp.min.css
38 ms
max-shbp-header-legacy.min.css
42 ms
max-sh-shbp.min.css
39 ms
max-sh-shbp-header-legacy.min.css
45 ms
min-768-max-1024-p.min.css
43 ms
min-768-max-1024-p-header-legacy.min.css
42 ms
max-sh-cbp.min.css
41 ms
max-sh-sbp.min.css
41 ms
max-sh-640.min.css
41 ms
max-shbp-18.min.css
40 ms
max-shbp-32.min.css
63 ms
max-640.min.css
42 ms
max-main.min.css
44 ms
max-cbp.min.css
42 ms
max-sh-cbp-social-sharing.min.css
40 ms
max-sh-cbp.min.css
40 ms
min-768-max-1024-p.min.css
69 ms
max-640.min.css
39 ms
max-1c.css
53 ms
max-2c.css
41 ms
min-2c-max-3c.css
39 ms
min-3c-max-4c.css
43 ms
min-4c-max-5c.css
50 ms
min-5c-max-6c.css
39 ms
off-canvas-md.min.css
39 ms
off-canvas-sm.min.css
38 ms
oxfordediting.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
oxfordediting.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
oxfordediting.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oxfordediting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oxfordediting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oxfordediting.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Oxford Editing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: