1.7 sec in total
113 ms
1.4 sec
182 ms
Click here to check amazing Oxford Reference content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about oxfordreference.com
Oxford Reference - Answers with Authority
Visit oxfordreference.comWe analyzed Oxfordreference.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
oxfordreference.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.7 s
0/100
10%
Value12.5 s
0/100
25%
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value330 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.306
38/100
15%
Value26.5 s
0/100
10%
113 ms
491 ms
37 ms
19 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Oxfordreference.com, 6% (7 requests) were made to Wac.e887.edgecastcdn.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to Gab.cookie.oup.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (491 ms) belongs to the original domain Oxfordreference.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (64%)
2.2 MB
797.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Oxfordreference.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.9 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oxford Reference images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 259.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oxfordreference.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 259.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (70%)
108
32
The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oxford Reference. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oxfordreference.com
113 ms
www.oxfordreference.com
491 ms
gtm.js
37 ms
default.css
19 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4_1.css
33 ms
OdoPopupWidgetModule.css
20 ms
ResourceSelector.css
21 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
21 ms
default.css
27 ms
normalize.css
24 ms
style.css
50 ms
common.css
62 ms
mystuff.css
47 ms
override.css
85 ms
contentCSS
60 ms
modernizr.min.js
81 ms
respond.min.js
80 ms
prototype.js
90 ms
scriptaculous.js
89 ms
effects.js
81 ms
tapestry.js
92 ms
tapestry-messages.js
92 ms
min.js
94 ms
oupapp.js
89 ms
cookie.js
89 ms
tapestry_fixes.js
92 ms
OdoPopupWidgetModule.js
95 ms
js
54 ms
window.js
114 ms
lightbox.js
93 ms
LoginBox.js
114 ms
arachne.js
116 ms
urchin.js
118 ms
oupcookiepolicy.fancybox.js
23 ms
oup.cookiepolicy.pack.js
18 ms
home-feature-article_style.css
143 ms
noJS.css
41 ms
hover.css
48 ms
ihp1stb.js
130 ms
ntpagetag.js
71 ms
skin.js
116 ms
tapestrydefaults.css
76 ms
tapestryoverride.css
78 ms
layout.css
81 ms
home.css
89 ms
entry.css
96 ms
browse.css
92 ms
popups.css
101 ms
widgets.css
109 ms
annotations.css
105 ms
tokens.css
108 ms
overlay.css
115 ms
disabled.css
118 ms
icons.css
119 ms
glossary.css
121 ms
locale.css
117 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
product-nav.css
109 ms
states.css
106 ms
collapser.css
112 ms
collect
12 ms
builder.js
42 ms
dragdrop.js
40 ms
controls.js
41 ms
slider.js
47 ms
sound.js
46 ms
chart
180 ms
archeology_small.jpg
248 ms
__utm.gif
175 ms
logo-ORO.gif
180 ms
btn_search.png
177 ms
close_arrow.png
176 ms
specialize_plus.png
177 ms
btn-close.gif
178 ms
bkgd-nav-arrow.png
185 ms
faux_bkg_column_lt.gif
180 ms
border.jpg
178 ms
history_small.jpg
154 ms
art_small.jpg
154 ms
language_small.jpg
150 ms
performing_small.jpg
124 ms
media_small.jpg
129 ms
medicine_small.jpg
125 ms
classical_small.jpg
128 ms
linguistics_small.jpg
125 ms
law2.jpg
123 ms
literature_small.jpg
123 ms
RSS.png
124 ms
email.png
126 ms
btn-rss.png
125 ms
logo-footer-oup.gif
125 ms
ntpagetag.gif
90 ms
pf_oiunderbar.css
79 ms
UnderbarHostsJS
77 ms
01-01-2000
190 ms
philosophy_small.jpg
30 ms
names_small.jpg
30 ms
music_small.jpg
31 ms
quotations_small.jpg
34 ms
religion_small.jpg
27 ms
science_small.jpg
27 ms
society_small.jpg
31 ms
sociology_small.jpg
30 ms
ui.dialog.css
32 ms
ui.resizable.css
33 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
268 ms
jcarousellite.js
141 ms
pf_oiunderbarinit.js
185 ms
print.css
19 ms
implied
97 ms
oxfordreference.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
oxfordreference.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
oxfordreference.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oxfordreference.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oxfordreference.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oxfordreference.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oxford Reference. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: