Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

oxoww.com

Index of /

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

193 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

19 ms

oxoww.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Oxoww content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about oxoww.com

Forward Arogaworldwide.com

Visit oxoww.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Oxoww.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oxoww.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.795

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

oxoww.com

193 ms

arogaworldwide.com

358 ms

arogaworldwide.com

280 ms

base

26 ms

home

773 ms

Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Oxoww.com, 80% (86 requests) were made to Arogaworldwide.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Kenwheeler.github.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (773 ms) relates to the external source Arogaworldwide.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (25%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Oxoww.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 176 B

  • Original 410 B
  • After minification 364 B
  • After compression 234 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 46 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 176 B or 43% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oxoww images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 662.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 980.2 kB
  • After compression 377.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 662.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 518.4 kB

  • Original 641.3 kB
  • After minification 585.2 kB
  • After compression 122.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oxoww.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 518.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (79%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oxoww. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

oxoww.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

oxoww.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

oxoww.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oxoww.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Oxoww.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oxoww. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: