Tools & Wizards About Us
ozarc.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

ozarc.net

Ooops!

Page Load Speed

267 ms in total

First Response

91 ms

Resources Loaded

104 ms

Page Rendered

72 ms

ozarc.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ozarc.net homepage info - get ready to check Ozarc best content right away, or after learning these important things about ozarc.net

Visit ozarc.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ozarc.net page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 176 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ozarc.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ozarc.net

91 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ozarc.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (91 ms) belongs to the original domain Ozarc.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.3 kB (9%)

Content Size

56.2 kB

After Optimization

50.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ozarc.net main page is 56.2 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 32.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 52 B

  • Original 214 B
  • After minification 214 B
  • After compression 162 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52 B or 24% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 32.0 kB
  • After minification 32.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ozarc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.1 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ozarc.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Network Requests Diagram

ozarc.net

ozarc.net

91 ms

Accessibility Review

ozarc.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

ozarc.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

ozarc.net SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ozarc.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ozarc.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ozarc.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ozarc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: