Tools & Wizards About Us
charleston.paulmitchell.edu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 95% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

charleston.paulmitchell.edu

Cosmetology & Beauty School Charleston, SC | Paul Mitchell

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

764 ms

charleston.paulmitchell.edu screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Charleston Paul Mitchell content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about charleston.paulmitchell.edu

Looking to start your cosmetology education? Paul Mitchell Charleston, one of the leading beauty schools, is here to help. Click to learn more!

Visit charleston.paulmitchell.edu

Key Findings

We analyzed Charleston.paulmitchell.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

charleston.paulmitchell.edu performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value16,950 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

charleston.paulmitchell.edu

11 ms

575 ms

jquery.min.js

186 ms

analytics.js

114 ms

fbevents.js

176 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Charleston.paulmitchell.edu, 28% (22 requests) were made to Dsfee43herbpw.cloudfront.net and 22% (17 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (956 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 814.1 kB (35%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Charleston.paulmitchell.edu main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 156.4 kB

  • Original 194.1 kB
  • After minification 181.9 kB
  • After compression 37.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charleston Paul Mitchell images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 646.9 kB

  • Original 976.3 kB
  • After minification 976.3 kB
  • After compression 329.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 646.9 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (49%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charleston Paul Mitchell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

charleston.paulmitchell.edu

charleston.paulmitchell.edu

11 ms

575 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

186 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

114 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

176 ms

59230242eb8d6b6dfe802718.png

59230242eb8d6b6dfe802718.png

158 ms

search

search

956 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

126 ms

758 ms

ae438dc3214446906348ffd5.png

ae438dc3214446906348ffd5.png

96 ms

uploads%2F596960982945ee038ae1c853icon-facebook.png

uploads%2F596960982945ee038ae1c853icon-facebook.png

95 ms

uploads%2F1d72a70e0d5ce5c74aff6297icon-twitter.png

uploads%2F1d72a70e0d5ce5c74aff6297icon-twitter.png

96 ms

uploads%2F56032ee251a422c232d4a6bbicon-youtube.png

uploads%2F56032ee251a422c232d4a6bbicon-youtube.png

96 ms

uploads%2F1636dca00d8b64299541eb8ficon-pinterest.png

uploads%2F1636dca00d8b64299541eb8ficon-pinterest.png

96 ms

uploads%2Ff76cc9b6096d105561ca2f0ficon-instagram.png

uploads%2Ff76cc9b6096d105561ca2f0ficon-instagram.png

97 ms

uploads%2F5f5d17cae95fcd8105dd4a69gplus.png

uploads%2F5f5d17cae95fcd8105dd4a69gplus.png

100 ms

25a032ca4da2b5d2e2c77d8a.jpg

25a032ca4da2b5d2e2c77d8a.jpg

128 ms

8a88a8fd9a75266a51194c17CHARLESTON.jpg

8a88a8fd9a75266a51194c17CHARLESTON.jpg

121 ms

e484988dc17a75b15bbf4d3c.jpg

e484988dc17a75b15bbf4d3c.jpg

137 ms

5854f59d3750603f1659fedf.jpg

5854f59d3750603f1659fedf.jpg

137 ms

622de3418a378177438ae15d.jpg

622de3418a378177438ae15d.jpg

121 ms

00b66435bc28b2e19172df79.png

00b66435bc28b2e19172df79.png

122 ms

c126b9a569508ee3ac708172.jpg

c126b9a569508ee3ac708172.jpg

135 ms

8de02d6bf0fc06bda19450ef.jpg

8de02d6bf0fc06bda19450ef.jpg

136 ms

f3a9b0ca7e070b203ca3b18b.jpg

f3a9b0ca7e070b203ca3b18b.jpg

144 ms

bcbecc1cab91e1d76dd64fba.png

bcbecc1cab91e1d76dd64fba.png

135 ms

8ccf2851b941dd99cd460489.woff

8ccf2851b941dd99cd460489.woff

802 ms

21cb17dfb2280ad390a2d860.woff

21cb17dfb2280ad390a2d860.woff

878 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

45 ms

7dc70509ebfab2ca743bd8df.woff

7dc70509ebfab2ca743bd8df.woff

631 ms

4ebd3582e21ae4750a77d27e.woff

4ebd3582e21ae4750a77d27e.woff

549 ms

collect

collect

33 ms

37 ms

js

js

77 ms

init_embed.js

init_embed.js

38 ms

common.js

common.js

60 ms

map.js

map.js

79 ms

google4.png

google4.png

35 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

33 ms

static.js

static.js

32 ms

paulMitchellChat.js

paulMitchellChat.js

103 ms

complianceScripts.js

complianceScripts.js

126 ms

util.js

util.js

121 ms

onion.js

onion.js

121 ms

search_impl.js

search_impl.js

152 ms

stats.js

stats.js

103 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

67 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

59 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

58 ms

kh

kh

86 ms

picker.js

picker.js

51 ms

picker.date.js

picker.date.js

52 ms

vt

vt

166 ms

controls.js

controls.js

55 ms

vt

vt

119 ms

vt

vt

171 ms

vt

vt

128 ms

vt

vt

112 ms

vt

vt

114 ms

vt

vt

172 ms

vt

vt

189 ms

vt

vt

151 ms

vt

vt

149 ms

vt

vt

172 ms

vt

vt

191 ms

vt

vt

174 ms

vt

vt

179 ms

vt

vt

227 ms

vt

vt

174 ms

css

css

96 ms

entity11.png

entity11.png

51 ms

mapcnt6.png

mapcnt6.png

27 ms

tmapctrl.png

tmapctrl.png

39 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

31 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

39 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

55 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

56 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

35 ms

Accessibility Review

charleston.paulmitchell.edu accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

charleston.paulmitchell.edu best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

charleston.paulmitchell.edu SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charleston.paulmitchell.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Charleston.paulmitchell.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

charleston.paulmitchell.edu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Charleston Paul Mitchell. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: