Tools & Wizards About Us
gas.preisvergleich.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

gas.preisvergleich.de

Gaspreisvergleich 2024 ᐅ️ 1. Platz Preis/Leistung | PREISVERGLEICH.de

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

288 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

247 ms

gas.preisvergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Visit gas.preisvergleich.de now to see the best up-to-date Gas PREISVERGLEICH content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gas.preisvergleich.de

Gaspreisvergleich beim Testsieger ➤ jetzt günstige Anbieter & Tarife kostenlos im Vergleich » bis 1.000€ sparen ✅ Ausgezeichnet durch DtGV ✓ 1. Platz ✓ Sofortbonus ✓

Visit gas.preisvergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Gas.preisvergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 288 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Gas.preisvergleich.de rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

gas.preisvergleich.de performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,020 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gas.preisvergleich.de

288 ms

gas.preisvergleich.de

787 ms

css

68 ms

main.css.var__201602241122

588 ms

power.css.var__201602241122

605 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Gas.preisvergleich.de, 27% (14 requests) were made to Media.preisvergleich.de and 8% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (787 ms) belongs to the original domain Gas.preisvergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.1 kB (17%)

Content Size

647.6 kB

After Optimization

537.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gas.preisvergleich.de main page is 647.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 478.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 82.2 kB
  • After minification 63.8 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.4 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 28.9 kB

  • Original 478.4 kB
  • After minification 449.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gas PREISVERGLEICH images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 86.5 kB
  • After minification 85.8 kB
  • After compression 72.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 298 B

  • Original 554 B
  • After minification 510 B
  • After compression 256 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gas.preisvergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 298 B or 54% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (54%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gas PREISVERGLEICH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gas.preisvergleich.de

gas.preisvergleich.de

288 ms

gas.preisvergleich.de

gas.preisvergleich.de

787 ms

css

css

68 ms

main.css.var__201602241122

main.css.var__201602241122

588 ms

power.css.var__201602241122

power.css.var__201602241122

605 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

44 ms

jquery.js.var__201602241122

jquery.js.var__201602241122

784 ms

main.js.var__201602241122

main.js.var__201602241122

598 ms

logo.png

logo.png

52 ms

iStock_000014813510XSmall_mit-Quellenangabe-150x150.jpg

iStock_000014813510XSmall_mit-Quellenangabe-150x150.jpg

572 ms

tuev.svg

tuev.svg

375 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

370 ms

Irsching-150x150.jpg

Irsching-150x150.jpg

602 ms

iStock_000012873749XSmall_mit-Quellenangabe-150x150.jpg

iStock_000012873749XSmall_mit-Quellenangabe-150x150.jpg

674 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

58 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

88 ms

pvg_branding_sprite_3.6.3.png__201602241122

pvg_branding_sprite_3.6.3.png__201602241122

661 ms

pvg_sprite_share_this_3.6.3.png__201602241122

pvg_sprite_share_this_3.6.3.png__201602241122

388 ms

1ab9c8e91993f807ae8ad8251d668e6a.js

1ab9c8e91993f807ae8ad8251d668e6a.js

497 ms

M__Wu4PAmHf4YZvQM8tWsDnFfol0SnfBMmbnmUK0fZM.ttf

M__Wu4PAmHf4YZvQM8tWsDnFfol0SnfBMmbnmUK0fZM.ttf

57 ms

DsLzC9scoPnrGiwYYMQXpkpeNX8RPf6i6WQfJWyCWEs.ttf

DsLzC9scoPnrGiwYYMQXpkpeNX8RPf6i6WQfJWyCWEs.ttf

58 ms

icon_pvg.woff__201602241122

icon_pvg.woff__201602241122

396 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

300 ms

bat.js

bat.js

315 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

collect

collect

71 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

48 ms

104 ms

119 ms

pvg_sprite_main.png__201602241122

pvg_sprite_main.png__201602241122

722 ms

pvg_sprite_icon_3.6.3.png__201602241122

pvg_sprite_icon_3.6.3.png__201602241122

193 ms

pvg_sprite_badgets.png__201602241122

pvg_sprite_badgets.png__201602241122

288 ms

pvg_sprite_3.6.3.png__201602241122

pvg_sprite_3.6.3.png__201602241122

127 ms

pvg_sprite_pics.jpg__201602241122

pvg_sprite_pics.jpg__201602241122

458 ms

seal.php

seal.php

196 ms

100 ms

adition.sjs

adition.sjs

371 ms

secure_tag_head_ad1_adfarm1.js

secure_tag_head_ad1_adfarm1.js

479 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

collect

collect

45 ms

21 ms

collect

collect

6 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

23 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

43 ms

adition.js

adition.js

173 ms

track

track

89 ms

js

js

108 ms

ywa.js

ywa.js

26 ms

uid.html

uid.html

91 ms

banner

banner

92 ms

Accessibility Review

gas.preisvergleich.de accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

gas.preisvergleich.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gas.preisvergleich.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gas.preisvergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gas.preisvergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

gas.preisvergleich.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gas PREISVERGLEICH. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: