2.3 sec in total
73 ms
1.9 sec
243 ms
Click here to check amazing Paperless content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about paperless.mx
Cumplimos 20 años siendo los expertos en almacenar, digitalizar y destruir información. Conoce nuestras soluciones en México y Querétaro.
Visit paperless.mxWe analyzed Paperless.mx page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
paperless.mx performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value200 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.293
41/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
73 ms
57 ms
79 ms
85 ms
88 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Paperless.mx, 51% (47 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 13% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (621 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (74%)
4.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Paperless.mx main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 94.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Paperless needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.9 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.9 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 181.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paperless.mx needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 181.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (83%)
86
15
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paperless. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
paperless.mx
73 ms
www.paperless.mx
57 ms
bt
79 ms
require.min.js
85 ms
main-r.min.js
88 ms
viewer.css
81 ms
ugc-viewer
45 ms
dynamicmodel
36 ms
b1393b_6164a52d9cfbf64d911cab23831b3103_128.json.z
589 ms
b1393b_08c5e00bcd98b3c3cbfdaadee110a0f2_128.json.z
621 ms
ugc-viewer
87 ms
bt
88 ms
skins.min.js
229 ms
components.min.js
84 ms
utils.min.js
86 ms
core.min.js
226 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
85 ms
lodash.min.js
57 ms
TweenMax.min.js
222 ms
layout.min.js
223 ms
tpa.min.js
227 ms
fonts.min.js
224 ms
animations.min.js
226 ms
swfobject.min.js
227 ms
mousetrap.min.js
232 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
233 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
225 ms
react-dom.min.js
227 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
226 ms
widgets.min.js
226 ms
experiment.js
227 ms
render.min.js
226 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
225 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
229 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
224 ms
zepto.min.js
216 ms
color.min.js
215 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
101 ms
bt
568 ms
bt
445 ms
latin.css
174 ms
StripShowcase.html
187 ms
load-widget.aspx
193 ms
conversion_async.js
149 ms
0fdef751204647a3bbd7eaa2827ed4f9.png
68 ms
c7d035ba85f6486680c2facedecdcf4d.png
68 ms
6ea5b4a88f0b4f91945b40499aa0af00.png
97 ms
b1393b_f658980b92f74db9bcc4e4a0abec944c.png
443 ms
05e3dc_943db37ac3dd4d1ea09be299afc177d1.png
128 ms
05e3dc_36a9034707dc400ba4ca95194b0533ca.png
315 ms
b1393b_406c50e6a4b841c89673fd9138e95aa5.jpg
442 ms
b1393b_62082ff7c7f249fc9a42476e10e7d287.jpg
442 ms
b1393b_8b50984b17e84a09bff6376b4fb35fd9.jpg
443 ms
b1393b_07942832955a4f39b37dd086b81e2b3b.jpg
442 ms
bt
94 ms
bt
93 ms
bt
94 ms
dc.js
274 ms
jquery.min.js
78 ms
lodash.min.js
74 ms
jquery.hammer.min.js
62 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
64 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
64 ms
jquery.cycle2.tile.js
62 ms
jquery.cycle2.scrollVert.min.js
249 ms
jquery.cycle2.carousel.js
250 ms
jquery.hoverscroll.js
251 ms
utils.js
251 ms
app.proto.js
253 ms
wix.min.js
394 ms
style.min.css
249 ms
app.min.js
338 ms
reset.css
59 ms
screen.css
255 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
270 ms
jquery-ui.js
57 ms
feedback.js
249 ms
core.js
246 ms
public.js
246 ms
WebResource.axd
247 ms
ScriptResource.axd
336 ms
ScriptResource.axd
334 ms
jquery.min.js
68 ms
wix.min.js
332 ms
ui-lib.min.js
379 ms
225 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
224 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
224 ms
bc176270-17fa-4c78-a343-9fe52824e501.woff
240 ms
209 ms
ugc-viewer
67 ms
__utm.gif
89 ms
paperless.mx accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
paperless.mx best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
paperless.mx SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paperless.mx can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Paperless.mx main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
paperless.mx
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Paperless. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: