Tools & Wizards About Us
paristechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 57

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

paristechreview.com

ParisTech Review - the Online Magazine of ParisTech - Technology, Business, Economy, Society and Individuals

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

171 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

702 ms

paristechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to paristechreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Paris Tech Review best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about paristechreview.com

ParisTech Review is the online magazine of ParisTech that assesses how technological innovations will bring sweeping changes to business, the economy, society and individuals.

Visit paristechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Paristechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

paristechreview.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

68/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

paristechreview.com

171 ms

www.paristechreview.com

254 ms

common_css.php

162 ms

toprated.css

12 ms

recommendations.css

10 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Paristechreview.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (417 ms) belongs to the original domain Paristechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 541.4 kB (63%)

Content Size

863.9 kB

After Optimization

322.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Paristechreview.com main page is 863.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 464.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 108.2 kB

  • Original 140.9 kB
  • After minification 130.9 kB
  • After compression 32.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 19.5 kB

  • Original 121.9 kB
  • After minification 102.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Paris Tech Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 298.9 kB

  • Original 464.6 kB
  • After minification 440.7 kB
  • After compression 165.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 114.8 kB

  • Original 136.4 kB
  • After minification 117.1 kB
  • After compression 21.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paristechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (54%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

36

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paris Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

paristechreview.com

paristechreview.com

171 ms

www.paristechreview.com

www.paristechreview.com

254 ms

common_css.php

common_css.php

162 ms

toprated.css

toprated.css

12 ms

recommendations.css

recommendations.css

10 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

170 ms

jquery-1.3.2.min.js

jquery-1.3.2.min.js

409 ms

interface.js

interface.js

172 ms

livevalidation.js

livevalidation.js

172 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

12 ms

backtohome.png

backtohome.png

142 ms

logo_paristech_review.png

logo_paristech_review.png

148 ms

min_menu_spacer.png

min_menu_spacer.png

147 ms

bg_main_menu.png

bg_main_menu.png

148 ms

bg_menu_item.png

bg_menu_item.png

147 ms

guill_start.png

guill_start.png

148 ms

guill_end.png

guill_end.png

179 ms

logo_ptr_footer.png

logo_ptr_footer.png

179 ms

logo_cc.png

logo_cc.png

179 ms

bg_input_news.png

bg_input_news.png

137 ms

btn_free_search.png

btn_free_search.png

138 ms

bg_newsletter.jpg

bg_newsletter.jpg

138 ms

btn_ins_news.png

btn_ins_news.png

222 ms

count.js

count.js

141 ms

newmag_bottom.png

newmag_bottom.png

205 ms

PreviousArticlesYouMayHaveMissed_en.png

PreviousArticlesYouMayHaveMissed_en.png

207 ms

logo_ptr_editors.png

logo_ptr_editors.png

209 ms

ico_today_big.png

ico_today_big.png

207 ms

ico_spread.jpg

ico_spread.jpg

208 ms

sh2_adp3.png

sh2_adp3.png

196 ms

sh2_ardian3.png

sh2_ardian3.png

199 ms

sh2_axa.png

sh2_axa.png

198 ms

sh2_bollore.png

sh2_bollore.png

197 ms

sh2_cdc2.png

sh2_cdc2.png

199 ms

sh2_eads.png

sh2_eads.png

199 ms

sh2_lvmh.png

sh2_lvmh.png

275 ms

sh2_renault3.png

sh2_renault3.png

277 ms

sh2_total3.png

sh2_total3.png

278 ms

sh2_veolia3.png

sh2_veolia3.png

280 ms

sh2_vivendi.png

sh2_vivendi.png

281 ms

sh2_about.png

sh2_about.png

278 ms

followus_sprite.png

followus_sprite.png

352 ms

ico_bullet_green.png

ico_bullet_green.png

354 ms

bg_footer_elem.png

bg_footer_elem.png

355 ms

bg_menu_footer.png

bg_menu_footer.png

355 ms

legal_spacer.png

legal_spacer.png

356 ms

external.min.js

external.min.js

252 ms

ga.js

ga.js

27 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

50 ms

language_push_chooser_mask.jpg

language_push_chooser_mask.jpg

249 ms

language_push_chooser.jpg

language_push_chooser.jpg

417 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

46 ms

sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html

sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html

38 ms

likebox.php

likebox.php

249 ms

pixel

pixel

18 ms

pixel

pixel

16 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

27 ms

loader-14x14.gif

loader-14x14.gif

32 ms

get.php

get.php

203 ms

tooltip-loader.gif

tooltip-loader.gif

13 ms

roNeOY-tz5Y.css

roNeOY-tz5Y.css

41 ms

UHhaxo8Cs3k.css

UHhaxo8Cs3k.css

44 ms

_rx8naC75Dy.js

_rx8naC75Dy.js

52 ms

x5F9OMjKyLw.js

x5F9OMjKyLw.js

50 ms

ICDbTSzjQEg.js

ICDbTSzjQEg.js

46 ms

TTCre3391I0.js

TTCre3391I0.js

46 ms

1231575_10151859086883750_1082456704_n.jpg

1231575_10151859086883750_1082456704_n.jpg

73 ms

377226_10151152143948750_1248030529_n.jpg

377226_10151152143948750_1248030529_n.jpg

34 ms

428948_10150999903604507_1097977503_n.jpg

428948_10150999903604507_1097977503_n.jpg

31 ms

10553432_316309021869643_2415855394647381444_n.jpg

10553432_316309021869643_2415855394647381444_n.jpg

29 ms

558891_299886046779884_1208097247_n.jpg

558891_299886046779884_1208097247_n.jpg

33 ms

10599153_10208597702079421_1951749604426263854_n.jpg

10599153_10208597702079421_1951749604426263854_n.jpg

30 ms

12717931_949784645103258_1371646514595751761_n.jpg

12717931_949784645103258_1371646514595751761_n.jpg

33 ms

wL6VQj7Ab77.png

wL6VQj7Ab77.png

26 ms

s7jcwEQH7Sx.png

s7jcwEQH7Sx.png

20 ms

print_reset.css

print_reset.css

83 ms

resources.js

resources.js

183 ms

theme.css

theme.css

100 ms

I6-MnjEovm5.js

I6-MnjEovm5.js

3 ms

vlXaquuXMrr.js

vlXaquuXMrr.js

4 ms

print.css

print.css

81 ms

Accessibility Review

paristechreview.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

paristechreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

paristechreview.com SEO score

57

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paristechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paristechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

paristechreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Paris Tech Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: