14.3 sec in total
213 ms
13.2 sec
831 ms
Click here to check amazing Peddymark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about peddymark.com
Visit peddymark.comWe analyzed Peddymark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 14 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
peddymark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value670 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.055
98/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
213 ms
373 ms
5755 ms
469 ms
652 ms
Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Peddymark.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.websitepolicies.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Peddymark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 218.4 kB (4%)
6.1 MB
5.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Peddymark.com main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 167.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Peddymark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Peddymark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (47%)
104
55
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Peddymark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
peddymark.com
213 ms
peddymark.com
373 ms
www.peddymark.com
5755 ms
styles.css
469 ms
jquery.js
652 ms
easing.js
471 ms
jquery.mobile.js
472 ms
royalslider.css
352 ms
rs-default.css
462 ms
rs-universal.css
706 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
826 ms
styles.css
847 ms
styles.css
818 ms
styles.css
801 ms
styles.css
1109 ms
styles.css
1110 ms
styles.css
1265 ms
styles.css
1173 ms
styles.css
1198 ms
styles.css
1209 ms
styles.css
1564 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
70 ms
js
56 ms
js
104 ms
pageslide2.js
1397 ms
sitewide.js
1459 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1483 ms
config.js
1521 ms
jquery.royalslider.min.js
1801 ms
config.js
1762 ms
config.js
1870 ms
config.js
1888 ms
config.js
1887 ms
config.js
1899 ms
reset.css
1829 ms
fonts.css
1864 ms
core.css
1859 ms
template.css
1855 ms
core-formElements.css
1884 ms
core-mobileNav.css
1877 ms
core-pagination.css
2217 ms
core-popup.css
2216 ms
gtm.js
100 ms
mta.png
454 ms
cornwall-web-designers-dark.png
720 ms
pet-microchips.png
416 ms
animal-microchips.png
368 ms
icon-tel-white.png
368 ms
account-white.png
438 ms
basket-white.png
370 ms
account.png
429 ms
checkout.png
362 ms
microchip-logos.png
718 ms
icon-tel.png
753 ms
basket.png
710 ms
chips.png
1016 ms
microchip-implanter-training-courses.jpg
1154 ms
videodots.png
898 ms
poster.jpg
722 ms
icon-uk.png
1128 ms
icon-delivery.png
896 ms
icon-freechips.png
1119 ms
icon-arrow.png
1263 ms
microchips-offer.png
1438 ms
microchip-training-offer.png
1488 ms
8-x-1.4mm-microchips-uk-supplier.png
1511 ms
banner.jpg
1515 ms
1440_safer-pet-banner.jpg
1899 ms
titlebarbg.png
1630 ms
500_collartags.jpg
1973 ms
500_halo-scanner.jpg
2029 ms
500_iso-microchips.jpg
1877 ms
icon-rabbit.png
1877 ms
icon-cat.png
1973 ms
icon-smalldog.png
2246 ms
icon-mediumdog.png
2246 ms
icon-largedog.png
2262 ms
icon-horse.png
2418 ms
500_ad2-002.jpg
2320 ms
icon-horse-off.png
2456 ms
5star-rating.png
2613 ms
quotebottom.png
2500 ms
js
123 ms
analytics.js
183 ms
tracking.js
137 ms
fbevents.js
159 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
108 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
43 ms
65d75eb0-2601-4da5-a9a4-9ee67a470a59.woff
2365 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
2371 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
2480 ms
c9aeeabd-dd65-491d-b4be-3e0db9ae47a0.woff
2513 ms
4b978f72-bb48-46c3-909a-2a8cd2f8819c.woff
2592 ms
quotetop.png
2549 ms
hours.png
2810 ms
hours-3.png
2383 ms
pm-blog-pic.png
3031 ms
icon-arrow-green.png
2517 ms
900_amdo.png
2187 ms
icon-play.png
2480 ms
footerlogo.png
2457 ms
icon-address.png
2355 ms
icon-footer-tel.png
2654 ms
icon-footer-email.png
2558 ms
footer-facebook.png
2539 ms
footer-twitter.png
2176 ms
amdo.png
2448 ms
powered-by-barclaycard.png
2473 ms
loader.png
2599 ms
grab.png
2490 ms
rs-default.png
2320 ms
peddymark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
peddymark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
peddymark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Peddymark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Peddymark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
peddymark.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Peddymark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: