Tools & Wizards About Us
peepproject.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

peepproject.com

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

304 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

238 ms

peepproject.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Peepproject content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about peepproject.com

Visit peepproject.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Peepproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

peepproject.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

peepproject.com

304 ms

css

23 ms

reset-min.css

16 ms

peep.css

270 ms

logo.png

214 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Peepproject.com, 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Yui.yahooapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (620 ms) belongs to the original domain Peepproject.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 420.3 kB (68%)

Content Size

619.7 kB

After Optimization

199.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Peepproject.com main page is 619.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 470.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 22.8 kB

  • Original 31.4 kB
  • After minification 28.8 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 78.0 kB
  • After minification 63.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Peepproject needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 350.2 kB

  • Original 470.4 kB
  • After minification 470.4 kB
  • After compression 120.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 350.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 32.8 kB

  • Original 39.9 kB
  • After minification 39.8 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Peepproject.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Peepproject. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

peepproject.com

peepproject.com

304 ms

css

css

23 ms

reset-min.css

reset-min.css

16 ms

peep.css

peep.css

270 ms

logo.png

logo.png

214 ms

entry_image.jpg

entry_image.jpg

214 ms

entry_image.jpg

entry_image.jpg

214 ms

entry_image.jpg

entry_image.jpg

214 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

30 ms

peep.js

peep.js

620 ms

entry_image.jpg

entry_image.jpg

284 ms

bodybg.png

bodybg.png

175 ms

banner_overlay.png

banner_overlay.png

137 ms

Chunkfive-webfont.woff

Chunkfive-webfont.woff

136 ms

RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

4 ms

Chunkfive-webfont.ttf

Chunkfive-webfont.ttf

137 ms

Accessibility Review

peepproject.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

peepproject.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

peepproject.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Peepproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Peepproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

peepproject.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Peepproject. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: