6.1 sec in total
917 ms
4.7 sec
471 ms
Visit performancetiming.com now to see the best up-to-date Performance Timing content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about performancetiming.com
Visit performancetiming.comWe analyzed Performancetiming.com page load time and found that the first response time was 917 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
performancetiming.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
917 ms
87 ms
146 ms
148 ms
153 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Performancetiming.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Performancetiming.com.
Page size can be reduced by 782.1 kB (67%)
1.2 MB
387.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Performancetiming.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 802.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Performance Timing needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 556.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 556.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Performancetiming.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (71%)
70
20
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Performance Timing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.performancetiming.com
917 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
87 ms
style.css
146 ms
layout.css
148 ms
greenapple.css
153 ms
responsive.css
155 ms
formalize.css
166 ms
superfish.css
167 ms
prettyPhoto.css
216 ms
nonverblaster.css
218 ms
flexslider.css
232 ms
settings.css
226 ms
captions.php
610 ms
wordpress_file_upload_style.css
250 ms
wordpress_file_upload_style_safe.css
285 ms
jquery-ui.css
53 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.css
283 ms
default.min.css
292 ms
jquery.js
367 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
315 ms
swfobject.js
338 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
414 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
421 ms
json2.js
392 ms
wordpress_file_upload_functions.js
410 ms
eventorganiser-front-end.min.css
438 ms
effect.min.js
476 ms
superfish.js
484 ms
jquery.jcarousellite.js
486 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
472 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
493 ms
jquery.formalize.min.js
538 ms
nonverblaster.js
530 ms
app.js
531 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
540 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
569 ms
comment-reply.min.js
602 ms
core.min.js
598 ms
widget.min.js
830 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
525 ms
mouse.min.js
772 ms
slider.min.js
766 ms
datepicker.min.js
765 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.js
755 ms
wp-embed.min.js
753 ms
qtip2.js
703 ms
button.min.js
704 ms
moment.min.js
691 ms
fullcalendar.min.js
691 ms
event-manager.min.js
671 ms
frontend.min.js
637 ms
analytics.js
154 ms
performance-timing-logo6.jpg
314 ms
irongrip.png
282 ms
to-top.png
667 ms
email.png
140 ms
twitter_alt.png
189 ms
divider1.png
135 ms
zoom.png
2468 ms
arrow-right.gif
2098 ms
performance-timing-footer-logo.png
192 ms
footer-contact-adress.png
236 ms
footer-contact-phone.png
276 ms
footer-contact-fax.png
275 ms
footer-contact-email.png
649 ms
footer-contact-internet.png
641 ms
email.png
644 ms
twitter_alt.png
645 ms
footer-pformat-standard.png
645 ms
footer-twitter-widget.png
646 ms
Powered-By-RFID-Logo.gif
225 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
50 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
46 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
46 ms
collect
60 ms
admin-ajax.php
551 ms
performancetiming.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
performancetiming.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
performancetiming.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Performancetiming.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Performancetiming.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
performancetiming.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Performance Timing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: