36.1 sec in total
230 ms
18.6 sec
17.2 sec
Welcome to photoloot.com homepage info - get ready to check Photoloot best content right away, or after learning these important things about photoloot.com
Visit photoloot.comWe analyzed Photoloot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 35.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
photoloot.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value7.9 s
22/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.224
56/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
230 ms
2093 ms
477 ms
744 ms
246 ms
Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Photoloot.com, 92% (110 requests) were made to Bottlereport.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) relates to the external source Bottlereport.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (19%)
5.5 MB
4.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Photoloot.com main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 140.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.1 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photoloot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 423.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 423.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 453.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Photoloot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 453.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (67%)
114
38
The browser has sent 114 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photoloot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
photoloot.com
230 ms
bottlereport.com
2093 ms
style.css
477 ms
colorpicker.css
744 ms
css
246 ms
css
282 ms
style-Black.css
458 ms
b0da6aea_ai1ec_parsed_css.css
2079 ms
styles.css
664 ms
responsive.css
1890 ms
shortcodes.css
665 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
2342 ms
scrollGallery.css
2344 ms
scrollGallery_greyDesign.css
2351 ms
magnific_popup.css
2393 ms
page_templates.css
2394 ms
swfobject.js
2335 ms
jquery.js
2649 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2349 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
3449 ms
css
394 ms
si_captcha.js
3447 ms
trigger_buttons.min.css
2315 ms
shutter.min.css
4179 ms
font-awesome.min.css
4227 ms
style.min.css
4340 ms
style.min.css
4338 ms
nggallery.css
4422 ms
superfish.js
4194 ms
custom.js
4127 ms
scripts.js
4592 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
4611 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
4612 ms
et_flexslider.js
4613 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
4606 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
4606 ms
et-ptemplates-frontend.js
4606 ms
wp-embed.min.js
4638 ms
picturefill.min.js
4790 ms
ajax.min.js
4791 ms
common.min.js
4772 ms
lightbox_context.min.js
4196 ms
shutter.min.js
4390 ms
nextgen_shutter.min.js
4314 ms
justified-gallery-3.6.min.js
3435 ms
jquery.waitforimages.min.js
4047 ms
underscore.min.js
3656 ms
mosaic_init.min.js
3668 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
3665 ms
masonry.min.js
3648 ms
nextgen_pro_masonry.min.js
3678 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
3654 ms
ga.js
2471 ms
search_btn.png
1918 ms
logo_br.png
1866 ms
083017calvertswide.jpg
1900 ms
083117dauphinwide.jpg
1950 ms
08_25_2017_vineyardwide.jpg
1951 ms
SteeleSeminar_WineWorld_08252017Wide.jpg
1960 ms
082317ILwide.jpg
1993 ms
082417hayewide.jpg
2096 ms
ElysianBrewingPixieDustWide.jpg
2096 ms
08192017_Beerfest_wide1.jpg
2161 ms
calvert95thumb.jpg
2113 ms
dennismug2-5654_95x54.jpg
2130 ms
vineyard-wine-market-thumb-15879_95x54.gif
1807 ms
WineWorldLogolg-11813_95x54.jpg
1847 ms
DanBrewLogo4-20403_95x54.png
1828 ms
BEERFEST-4_thumbnail-12369_95x54.jpg
1968 ms
calvert95thumb-3539_40x40.jpg
1986 ms
vineyard-wine-market-thumb-15879_40x40.gif
1967 ms
WineWorldLogolg-11813_40x40.jpg
2070 ms
WINELOGO_Color400-40x40.gif
2070 ms
gyn-support-45073_40x40.png
2040 ms
chelan-logo-40x40.png
2040 ms
dennismug2-5654_40x40.jpg
1867 ms
DanBrewLogo4-20403_40x40.png
1912 ms
WineWorldLogolg-11813_130x130.jpg
1894 ms
vineyard-wine-market-thumb-15879_67x67.gif
1915 ms
dennismug2-5654_67x67.jpg
1915 ms
WineWorldLogolg-11813_67x67.jpg
3505 ms
VIne11LOGO2.gif
2842 ms
WineWorldLogolg250.gif
2781 ms
SafegroundAdLarge.gif
2769 ms
vinworxlogolg.jpg
2770 ms
header-bg.png
2770 ms
top-shadow.png
2803 ms
bottom-shadow.png
2785 ms
search-bg.png
2784 ms
body-bg16.png
2784 ms
top-stich.png
2683 ms
content-bg.png
2626 ms
content-main-shadow.png
2687 ms
content-top-shadow.png
2677 ms
content-bottom-shadow.png
2644 ms
menu-bottom-bg.png
2544 ms
secondary-menu-bg.png
2550 ms
left-arrow.png
2407 ms
right-arrow.png
2891 ms
controller-overlay.png
2873 ms
featured-arrow.png
2873 ms
title-bg.png
2823 ms
recent-content-bg.png
2822 ms
post-overlay.png
2683 ms
more.png
2764 ms
entry-latest-overlay.png
2760 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
204 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
175 ms
XreLooTt3EU7pik51LvgPw.ttf
1718 ms
a1jgjBwEF1FcIjUj3bw8cfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
1679 ms
entry-overlay.png
2683 ms
footer-top-shadow.png
3226 ms
footer-bottom-shadow.png
3227 ms
footer-bottom-bg.png
3226 ms
menu-bg.png
3226 ms
__utm.gif
680 ms
featured-top-shadow.png
1458 ms
featured-bottom-shadow.png
958 ms
featured-description.png
1136 ms
readmore.png
1135 ms
photoloot.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
photoloot.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
photoloot.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photoloot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Photoloot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
photoloot.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Photoloot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: