Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

photosnack.net

SnackTools | Web Apps For Content Creation & Distribution

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

953 ms

Page Rendered

102 ms

photosnack.net screenshot

About Website

Visit photosnack.net now to see the best up-to-date Photo Snack content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about photosnack.net

SnackTools is an online set of web applications designed to simplify the way you create, share and manage content for web.

Visit photosnack.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Photosnack.net page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

photosnack.net performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value21,530 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

photosnack.net

214 ms

www.snacktools.com

392 ms

minified.js

60 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

39 ms

polyfill.min.js

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Photosnack.net, 74% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (392 ms) relates to the external source Snacktools.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 226.7 kB (42%)

Content Size

544.8 kB

After Optimization

318.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Photosnack.net main page is 544.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 266.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 173.5 kB

  • Original 235.0 kB
  • After minification 233.4 kB
  • After compression 61.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 53.1 kB

  • Original 266.1 kB
  • After minification 213.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Photo Snack needs image optimization as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 48 B

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 43.7 kB
  • After compression 43.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (56%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photo Snack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

photosnack.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

photosnack.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

photosnack.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photosnack.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Photosnack.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Photo Snack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: