Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

pipedoc.net

24-hour Plumbing & Heating Services | Repairs, Maintenance, Emergencies

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

175 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

351 ms

pipedoc.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pipedoc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pipedoc.net

Through honest answers and meticulous job performance, Pipe Doctor Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning delivers cost-effective and long-term solutions.

Visit pipedoc.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Pipedoc.net page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pipedoc.net performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,550 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.134

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pipedoc.net

175 ms

www.pipedoc.net

111 ms

bU5dDoIwDL6QZfLkeeZWsDrW2XYit4dANITw1n7_rXvRSJC4ZwheuComZw-SCMWLTe75rihTc_9qoohy_C_tWUCoajyA2pRQF8lYYINQQPBDOKoLqmc49JhRvGFcfIGz-WDQsQxwc5RDqhE37z_cUI0GzuTTxuyBM75L-Ft_dYUKRg5NRnNrNS2lujsPmrV2Bg.css

11 ms

M9AvyCxITclP1stLLdHPKtYvTi7Kz8mJB7KyCktTiyr1cp1Li0vyc4PB4kmJRQA.css

5 ms

bU3bDsIgDP2hQV188Hug62IVClJw4-9dzNRk8e3czwjktJvZCXafVviC26NR6fbDzWjP9mIjyzACZcaFxWjzioU9FQWtPdBwgsyZpoRWqMLV4f0gFdKcRPl5zGLTmiKqCi3bRQxGA09UwKlS3fbfTGEOtO7OD_4rRKpuV3LzgfEF.css

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Pipedoc.net, 9% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (343 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (29%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Pipedoc.net main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 175.5 kB

  • Original 210.2 kB
  • After minification 210.2 kB
  • After compression 34.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 175.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 50.0 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pipedoc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 580.3 kB

  • Original 826.3 kB
  • After minification 825.4 kB
  • After compression 246.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 580.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 401.5 kB

  • Original 499.6 kB
  • After minification 497.3 kB
  • After compression 98.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pipedoc.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 401.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (59%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pipedoc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pipedoc.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

pipedoc.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pipedoc.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pipedoc.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pipedoc.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pipedoc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: