3.9 sec in total
551 ms
3.1 sec
247 ms
Welcome to pis2016.org homepage info - get ready to check PIS 2016 best content for Brazil right away, or after learning these important things about pis2016.org
Tudo sobre o PIS 2016 ✓ Calendário do PIS 2016 ✓ Como receber o Abono Salarial ✓ quem tem direito ao PIS ✓ Qual o valor do PIS ✓ E muito mais...
Visit pis2016.orgWe analyzed Pis2016.org page load time and found that the first response time was 551 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pis2016.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.244
51/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
551 ms
20 ms
40 ms
37 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Pis2016.org, 25% (24 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (9 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (957 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 516.3 kB (59%)
868.7 kB
352.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Pis2016.org main page is 868.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 422.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PIS 2016 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 274.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 274.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 208.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pis2016.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 208.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (60%)
90
36
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PIS 2016. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pis2016.org
551 ms
style.css
20 ms
jquery.js
40 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
37 ms
q2w3-fixed-widget.min.js
37 ms
adsbygoogle.js
12 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
39 ms
wp-embed.min.js
36 ms
widgets.js
129 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
Z7rRjLgdGls
210 ms
all.js
290 ms
pis-2016.png
209 ms
bullet.png
42 ms
ca-pub-9816067320655622.js
63 ms
zrt_lookup.html
57 ms
show_ads_impl.js
61 ms
plusone.js
184 ms
collect
19 ms
ads
265 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
223 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
140 ms
www-embed-player.js
193 ms
base.js
262 ms
osd.js
22 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
40 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
40 ms
fastbutton
138 ms
ads
210 ms
ads
196 ms
ads
339 ms
postmessageRelay
164 ms
ads
333 ms
ads
155 ms
302 ms
xd_arbiter.php
310 ms
xd_arbiter.php
521 ms
ads
287 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
43 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
43 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
94 ms
10354241743405653005
155 ms
abg.js
169 ms
m_js_controller.js
222 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
67 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.pt.html
109 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
182 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
119 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
117 ms
ad_status.js
119 ms
s
76 ms
x_button_blue2.png
68 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
66 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
70 ms
16759041349014281086
61 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
24 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
16 ms
jot
89 ms
ping
43 ms
ui
13 ms
comments.php
166 ms
like.php
104 ms
ebiMDO3r-8l.css
287 ms
jGc-59L_9lo.css
357 ms
1M-hNYiGrgS.css
430 ms
uVjHKJ0glvg.css
556 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
627 ms
VvsfEObxnnn.js
627 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
493 ms
LTv6ZK-5zxz.js
700 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
570 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
656 ms
FyxLoiww5bU.js
690 ms
HaMjR2eXz4B.js
655 ms
WN2wSsLOuKy.js
693 ms
Kt4tkgSRvHH.js
698 ms
Q4A0UyjU8W2.js
736 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
735 ms
jJhqmvSAXq3.js
957 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
843 ms
activeview
123 ms
10291859_797646093680983_1981294820591103035_n.jpg
346 ms
like.png
30 ms
fav.png
21 ms
12742292_983817741700211_3779772686671014799_n.jpg
440 ms
12728968_1694801624067607_694084826637421913_n.jpg
567 ms
1457473_1621348874795300_2402441238196562443_n.jpg
514 ms
12376202_1044609905591669_1527874506219599743_n.jpg
554 ms
12744575_1038941742836241_1602570191375760623_n.jpg
543 ms
odA9sNLrE86.jpg
68 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
71 ms
K00K-UgnsKu.png
70 ms
eR-qA8bp1RM.js
75 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
69 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
74 ms
pis2016.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
pis2016.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pis2016.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
PT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pis2016.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Portuguese language. Our system also found out that Pis2016.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pis2016.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PIS 2016. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: