4.2 sec in total
814 ms
2.6 sec
763 ms
Welcome to pixartalk.com homepage info - get ready to check Pixartalk best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about pixartalk.com
A blog dedicated to all things Pixar...
Visit pixartalk.comWe analyzed Pixartalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 814 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pixartalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value3.2 s
74/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.177
68/100
15%
Value3.0 s
96/100
10%
814 ms
86 ms
89 ms
89 ms
97 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Pixartalk.com, 18% (18 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 11% (11 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixartalk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (79%)
3.4 MB
716.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Pixartalk.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pixartalk needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 80% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 86.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.4 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixartalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (42%)
95
55
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixartalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.pixartalk.com
814 ms
style.css
86 ms
widget.css
89 ms
style.css
89 ms
jetpack.css
97 ms
jquery.js
126 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
146 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
counters.js
203 ms
ca-pub-0457718712154902.js
109 ms
zrt_lookup.html
149 ms
show_ads_impl.js
103 ms
0.jpg
152 ms
F1HV100Z.jpg
152 ms
MainBanner7_2.jpg
226 ms
Ratatouille_lego-300x238.png
250 ms
TheGoodDinosaur-203x300.jpg
225 ms
insideoutuk-210x300.jpg
151 ms
Ratatouille-300x225.jpg
179 ms
monstersmexicoblufront-230x300.jpg
93 ms
inside_out-300x164.jpeg
179 ms
cars2blufront-232x300.jpg
239 ms
A_Bugs_Life-202x300.jpg
256 ms
buguk-212x300.jpg
238 ms
insideoutfinal-202x300.jpg
1279 ms
TwitterIconnew.jpg
255 ms
FacebookIconnew.jpg
256 ms
ppbanner.jpg
273 ms
0.jpg
148 ms
share-small.png
176 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
82 ms
gprofiles.js
146 ms
wpgroho.js
343 ms
swfobject.js
345 ms
e-201611.js
79 ms
widgets.js
114 ms
sdk.js
82 ms
plusone.js
220 ms
PinExt.png
159 ms
email-button.png
178 ms
ads
482 ms
osd.js
32 ms
q
52 ms
273 ms
a-logo-amazon.png
32 ms
513w44TvN-L._AC_SR98,95_.jpg
32 ms
ir
22 ms
json
125 ms
cart.gif
38 ms
xd_arbiter.php
43 ms
xd_arbiter.php
123 ms
wordpress.png
93 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
153 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
170 ms
fastbutton
320 ms
fastbutton
320 ms
fastbutton
319 ms
fastbutton
317 ms
fastbutton
313 ms
fastbutton
313 ms
fastbutton
425 ms
fastbutton
427 ms
fastbutton
445 ms
fastbutton
426 ms
g.gif
90 ms
hovercard.css
214 ms
services.css
215 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
401 ms
postmessageRelay
204 ms
rs=AGLTcCOWh6SesYbnpr6fsCoLzYc2DGNAaA
21 ms
m_js_controller.js
142 ms
abg.js
158 ms
like.php
204 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
205 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
187 ms
pJeswbKZO4XwVR0035gpgvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
234 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
210 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
161 ms
like.php
151 ms
like.php
296 ms
like.php
315 ms
like.php
335 ms
like.php
320 ms
like.php
325 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
132 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
119 ms
s
104 ms
x_button_blue2.png
97 ms
fy8tT2klpgR.js
100 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
158 ms
like.php
228 ms
like.php
270 ms
like.php
275 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
104 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
83 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
103 ms
jot.html
28 ms
ui
29 ms
pixartalk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pixartalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
pixartalk.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixartalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Pixartalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixartalk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pixartalk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: