2.1 sec in total
342 ms
934 ms
841 ms
Welcome to pixelkit.ru homepage info - get ready to check Pixelkit best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about pixelkit.ru
Подборка личных проектов и публикаций. С гостевухой и BBS.
Visit pixelkit.ruWe analyzed Pixelkit.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 342 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
pixelkit.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
69/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.242
51/100
15%
Value4.3 s
84/100
10%
342 ms
11 ms
8 ms
10 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pixelkit.ru, 18% (8 requests) were made to Assets.tumblr.com and 14% (6 requests) were made to 38.media.tumblr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (342 ms) belongs to the original domain Pixelkit.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 725.9 kB (41%)
1.8 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixelkit.ru main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 741.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixelkit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 453.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 453.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 203.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixelkit.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 203.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (32%)
41
28
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixelkit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixelkit.ru
342 ms
pre_tumblelog.js
11 ms
tumblelog_post_message_queue.js
8 ms
stylesheet.css
10 ms
index.js
29 ms
tumblr_lko318vaTi1qbbc3b.jpg
41 ms
tumblr_inline_n6nw65gHVL1qbbc3b.png
16 ms
tumblr_inline_mwpm2n8kO21qbbc3b.jpg
109 ms
tumblr_inline_mwpmu5VMxI1qbbc3b.jpg
95 ms
get_num_replies.js
208 ms
tumblr_inline_mwpnktCorQ1qbbc3b.jpg
179 ms
tumblr_inline_mtxzorL3rr1qbbc3b.jpg
262 ms
tumblr_inline_mrxfkaqAHt1qz4rgp.png
263 ms
tumblr_inline_mls22w68xg1qz4rgp.jpg
207 ms
tumblr_inline_mwpmv4xR3f1qbbc3b.jpg
9 ms
tumblr_inline_msqt3mdcbU1qz4rgp.jpg
4 ms
tumblr_inline_mtsjq9FFlg1qbbc3b.jpg
61 ms
tumblr_inline_mls21ngBGI1qz4rgp.jpg
67 ms
dxGj-muIP-U
73 ms
JzFoUnvwsLA
78 ms
ij9XwHEwDHU
69 ms
9On2ZN4txIg
68 ms
8KbGKBDs3sM
95 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
15 ms
www-embed-player.js
40 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
107 ms
ad_status.js
134 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
201 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
219 ms
ga.js
78 ms
impixu
239 ms
impixu
193 ms
analytics.html
168 ms
login_check.html
25 ms
avatar_fa0b839fa7f7_40.png
90 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
iframe_logo.png
20 ms
rapid-3.36.js
37 ms
rapidworker-1.2.js
36 ms
ga.js
48 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
cs.js
67 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
cedexis.radar.js
5 ms
pixelkit.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
pixelkit.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
pixelkit.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixelkit.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Pixelkit.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixelkit.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pixelkit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: