8.7 sec in total
2.5 sec
5.7 sec
493 ms
Visit pixellegancy.com now to see the best up-to-date Pixellegancy content for Peru and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixellegancy.com
Blog dedicado al diseño, recursos gratuitos y themes para WordPress. Descubre todo el potencial que puedes obtener de internet gracias a WordPress.
Visit pixellegancy.comWe analyzed Pixellegancy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
pixellegancy.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value230 ms
87/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
2514 ms
236 ms
363 ms
246 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Pixellegancy.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Wordpress.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixellegancy.com.
Page size can be reduced by 515.9 kB (37%)
1.4 MB
879.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Pixellegancy.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 811.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 204.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 204.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pixellegancy needs image optimization as it can save up to 91.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 134.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.3 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixellegancy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (36%)
67
43
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixellegancy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixellegancy.com
2514 ms
prettyPhoto.css
236 ms
style.css
363 ms
style1.css
246 ms
jquery.min.js
50 ms
envato-item-store-info.css
263 ms
swfobject.js
353 ms
cufon-yui.js
578 ms
Bebas_Neue_400.font.js
700 ms
styles.css
159 ms
postratings-css.css
270 ms
wptw.css
276 ms
jetpack.css
586 ms
pixellegancy.com
456 ms
350ux5f.png
177 ms
logo.png
251 ms
search.png
253 ms
twitter_16.png
253 ms
rss_16.png
378 ms
help.png
414 ms
furley.jpg
636 ms
shadow.png
489 ms
recursos-free.jpg
739 ms
preload.gif
504 ms
01fb2ee16e08888b7619e0cdf0cd305e.jpg
718 ms
comments.gif
750 ms
rating_off.gif
836 ms
loading.gif
849 ms
aa1d9f31a2f9e146c455c9ddb5639ce2.jpg
979 ms
bebb71b1bb087c435b1a8bf3e1252f64.jpg
1062 ms
171c7b736482029722c0a8fb5b1232ca.jpg
1080 ms
43d6f147059d61ee8372fae1dd50d8bc.jpg
1200 ms
30a504c9266be3e7f3d74829b9602188.jpg
1306 ms
905e2634c669e1d889ad23045e17c8b9.jpg
1285 ms
rating_on.gif
1315 ms
fb3bf732232159160256374d9bd7b0f2.jpg
1518 ms
9e2bbb514ccd5be5d3bacbbc96878b07.jpg
1541 ms
95a91c9db82ad97788a7132cf9098c51.jpg
1546 ms
c71335daff572e4df37ddbf600626b36.jpg
1648 ms
987ecc1d6b6189a3712d866d4d2ef1f2.jpg
1746 ms
744106bf5346f348d37f0ed7aee24e25.jpg
1785 ms
958263115bc53d09a430c841b839e4d2.jpg
1864 ms
63af73408da1cf48cc584665101d2683.jpg
1895 ms
91f4420637a56677a63a2f8f9b055c82.jpg
1972 ms
b8fb2fbbb887a3b0993f04862fa9fc8e.jpg
2019 ms
609c314bb2749562fc85c40e84112a9a.jpg
2117 ms
93880a30ed61d5700237d286629483cf.jpg
2126 ms
7ef45e2032269c5ac14215f761f0bc92.jpg
2206 ms
widgets.js
148 ms
c5c17e05dd9827cbdddff0c70bcddf25.jpg
2234 ms
404.gif
204 ms
d7133f0d1d98ddd3c5a56de5471a1646.jpg
2191 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
59 ms
39 ms
jquery.js
2327 ms
swfobject.js
2120 ms
upprev_js.php
2379 ms
171 ms
ga.js
79 ms
quicktags.min.js
2074 ms
0037a96fde306aead489c441d1bd7a38.jpg
2255 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
847c29a3a473b6488ac3e60c14bc3992.jpg
2300 ms
GRL_260x120_v2.jpg
2135 ms
1252.png
2284 ms
camisetas.png
2311 ms
correaco.png
2128 ms
sub-btn.png
2112 ms
rating_off.gif
2104 ms
bullet.png
2089 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
383 ms
pixellegancy.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
pixellegancy.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pixellegancy.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixellegancy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pixellegancy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixellegancy.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pixellegancy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: