20.8 sec in total
628 ms
15.9 sec
4.3 sec
Visit pixer.us now to see the best up-to-date Pixer content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixer.us
Ihre Agentur für SEO & SEA ✔ Social Media ✔ Webentwicklung ✔ Content, Fotografie & Video ✔ Corporate Publishing. Hier mehr erfahren!
Visit pixer.usWe analyzed Pixer.us page load time and found that the first response time was 628 ms and then it took 20.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
pixer.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value2,100 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.781
5/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
628 ms
183 ms
469 ms
185 ms
195 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Pixer.us, 14% (11 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 593.4 kB (58%)
1.0 MB
431.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Pixer.us main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 867.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 577.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 577.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixer.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (80%)
75
15
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixer.us
628 ms
styles.css
183 ms
prototype.js
469 ms
scriptaculous.js
185 ms
common.js
195 ms
sizer.js
183 ms
cropper.js
394 ms
rotator.js
263 ms
fliper.js
265 ms
colorfx.js
279 ms
undo.js
278 ms
brightness.js
354 ms
blur.js
315 ms
specialfx.js
329 ms
saturation.js
330 ms
save.js
410 ms
WebResource.axd
517 ms
prototype.ashx
499 ms
core.ashx
498 ms
converter.ashx
499 ms
PixerMain,App_Web_yu73mxlq.ashx
500 ms
WebResource.axd
481 ms
show_ads.js
27 ms
builder.js
168 ms
effects.js
201 ms
dragdrop.js
189 ms
controls.js
109 ms
slider.js
108 ms
trans.gif
587 ms
loadimage.gif
540 ms
save.gif
536 ms
undo.gif
508 ms
resize.gif
508 ms
crop.gif
507 ms
rotate.gif
508 ms
flip.gif
507 ms
effects.gif
705 ms
bright.gif
706 ms
saturation.gif
706 ms
color.gif
702 ms
blur.gif
509 ms
special.gif
494 ms
headerbg.gif
561 ms
logoheader.gif
548 ms
uploadedit.gif
547 ms
separator.gif
607 ms
ca-pub-3487691993618326.js
1023 ms
zrt_lookup.html
3783 ms
show_ads_impl.js
896 ms
bordereditor.gif
382 ms
ads
1297 ms
osd.js
973 ms
ads
335 ms
abg.js
1596 ms
osd_listener.js
2067 ms
bgcanvas.gif
2011 ms
ads
1182 ms
ad
350 ms
m_window_focus_non_hydra.js
348 ms
m_qs_click_protection.js
332 ms
gen_204
331 ms
ga.js
452 ms
11-250x250.jpg
3599 ms
abg.js
2306 ms
lidar.js
2442 ms
d5qAyLYU.js
2213 ms
__utm.gif
912 ms
pixel
684 ms
cookie_push.html
682 ms
9im3l02I.html
1226 ms
dpixel
1661 ms
transparent.png
968 ms
pixel
846 ms
pixel
847 ms
fpJ246J2fJ0bYHH6KdX6NZQGrKMRoryxUcO6omD8DP8.js
130 ms
activeview
78 ms
sync
684 ms
activeview
69 ms
pixer.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
pixer.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pixer.us SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixer.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Pixer.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixer.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: