2.1 sec in total
164 ms
1.6 sec
392 ms
Visit pixtr.me now to see the best up-to-date Pixtr content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixtr.me
Visit pixtr.meWe analyzed Pixtr.me page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
pixtr.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value1.4 s
100/100
25%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
164 ms
115 ms
75 ms
137 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Pixtr.me, 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (916 ms) belongs to the original domain Pixtr.me.
Page size can be reduced by 531.2 kB (19%)
2.9 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixtr.me main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixtr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 178.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 178.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 210.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixtr.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 210.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (18%)
44
36
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixtr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.pixtr.me
164 ms
__mainstyle.css
115 ms
jquery.min.js
75 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.js
137 ms
scripts.js
198 ms
onrun.js
135 ms
analytics.js
26 ms
logo.png
91 ms
social-panel.png
210 ms
fb-icon.png
111 ms
tw-icon.png
159 ms
yt-icon.png
213 ms
app-store-button.png
103 ms
google-play-button-cs.png
348 ms
back-image-1.jpg
488 ms
bg-gray-white-gray.jpg
213 ms
video-img.png
347 ms
to-down-button.png
345 ms
back-image-2.jpg
492 ms
phone-img.png
513 ms
tmuna947145062.png
569 ms
tmuna150594827.png
682 ms
tmuna973017187.png
541 ms
tmuna560276361.png
646 ms
tmuna770760995.png
680 ms
tmuna316614220.png
699 ms
tmuna491231282.png
686 ms
tmuna901730385.png
916 ms
tmuna878469208.png
827 ms
tmuna242189006.png
802 ms
slide-button-on.png
730 ms
slide-button-off.png
746 ms
back-image-3.jpg
861 ms
about-img.png
832 ms
send-button.png
802 ms
footer-bg.jpg
865 ms
troi-logo.png
855 ms
s6gc5CL6ZEA
74 ms
collect
11 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
60 ms
www-embed-player.js
80 ms
base.js
137 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
41 ms
ad_status.js
41 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
27 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
51 ms
__iphone.css
94 ms
pixtr.me accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
pixtr.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
pixtr.me SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixtr.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pixtr.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixtr.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixtr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: