31.6 sec in total
14.8 sec
16.5 sec
214 ms
Visit pointaviation.com now to see the best up-to-date Point Aviation content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pointaviation.com
Point Aviation provides Flight Training, Light Aircraft Repair, Maintenance and Inspection Service at our facility in Southwestern Wisconsin.
Visit pointaviation.comWe analyzed Pointaviation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14.8 sec and then it took 16.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
pointaviation.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.041
99/100
15%
Value8.3 s
39/100
10%
14824 ms
34 ms
138 ms
198 ms
722 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Pointaviation.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Pointaviation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (68%)
2.8 MB
888.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Pointaviation.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Point Aviation images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 596.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 596.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pointaviation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (82%)
71
13
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Point Aviation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pointaviation.com
14824 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
138 ms
flick.css
198 ms
pointaviation.com
722 ms
dashicons.min.css
275 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
208 ms
styles.css
160 ms
go_pricing_styles.css
216 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
245 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
275 ms
settings.css
327 ms
grid.css
317 ms
invicta.css
443 ms
css
26 ms
font-awesome.min.css
351 ms
flexslider.css
367 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
415 ms
flags.css
421 ms
add2home.css
433 ms
jquery.counter-analog.css
456 ms
js_composer.css
733 ms
dynamic.css
511 ms
jetpack.css
569 ms
jquery.js
602 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
545 ms
scrollTo.js
605 ms
jquery.form.min.js
804 ms
mailchimp.js
807 ms
core.min.js
805 ms
datepicker.js
832 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
972 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
846 ms
css
33 ms
css
46 ms
collect
18 ms
widget.min.js
823 ms
mouse.min.js
810 ms
resizable.min.js
809 ms
draggable.min.js
871 ms
button.min.js
880 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
gprofiles.js
66 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
position.min.js
901 ms
dialog.min.js
803 ms
wpdialog.min.js
793 ms
scripts.js
816 ms
go_pricing_scripts.js
848 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
837 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
806 ms
wpgroho.js
776 ms
jquery.easing.js
808 ms
invicta.js
846 ms
jquery.superfish.js
835 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
811 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
796 ms
add2home.js
747 ms
js_composer_front.js
741 ms
wp-embed.min.js
785 ms
sign3.png
277 ms
P1010562.jpg
460 ms
IMG_1529-2k.jpg
594 ms
DSC_0483.jpg
275 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
32 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxh_xHqYgAV9Bl_ZQbYUxnQU.woff
33 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxn5HxGBcBvicCpTp6spHfNo.woff
32 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
36 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxkCDe67GEgBv_HnyvHTfdew.woff
32 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
32 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
32 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
34 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
30 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
30 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
410 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
79 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
87 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
97 ms
hovercard.css
37 ms
services.css
52 ms
dropdown_arrow.png
141 ms
g.gif
9 ms
loader.gif
90 ms
revicons.woff
135 ms
pointaviation.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pointaviation.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pointaviation.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pointaviation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pointaviation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pointaviation.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Point Aviation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: