Tools & Wizards About Us
polymar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

polymar.com

Polymar - polyurethane sheet and film for the glass lamiting industry - Polymar Home

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

298 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

326 ms

polymar.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Polymar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about polymar.com

Polymar markets a unique range of specially formulated light stable polyurethane sheet and films for the glass laminating industry

Visit polymar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Polymar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 298 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

polymar.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.304

39/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

polymar.com

298 ms

782 ms

index.php

207 ms

modal.css

249 ms

attachments_hide.css

267 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Polymar.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) belongs to the original domain Polymar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 77.8 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Polymar.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 40.2 kB

  • Original 46.0 kB
  • After minification 30.9 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.1 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Polymar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 215.3 kB
  • After minification 214.3 kB
  • After compression 198.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 74.6 kB
  • After minification 74.6 kB
  • After compression 61.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polymar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (74%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polymar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

polymar.com

polymar.com

298 ms

782 ms

index.php

index.php

207 ms

modal.css

modal.css

249 ms

attachments_hide.css

attachments_hide.css

267 ms

attachments_list.css

attachments_list.css

274 ms

nucleus.css

nucleus.css

275 ms

galatea_10.css

galatea_10.css

388 ms

bootstrap-gantry.css

bootstrap-gantry.css

395 ms

joomla.css

joomla.css

331 ms

icomoon.css

icomoon.css

355 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

366 ms

galatea-joomla_10.css

galatea-joomla_10.css

369 ms

custom_10.css

custom_10.css

412 ms

demo.css

demo.css

444 ms

animate.css

animate.css

459 ms

squeezebox.css

squeezebox.css

462 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

493 ms

core.js

core.js

484 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

685 ms

modal.js

modal.js

531 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

646 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

549 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

573 ms

attachments_refresh.js

attachments_refresh.js

585 ms

caption.js

caption.js

620 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

642 ms

js

js

58 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

663 ms

squeezebox.min.js

squeezebox.min.js

679 ms

main.js

main.js

816 ms

owlcarousel.js

owlcarousel.js

768 ms

mosaicgrid.js

mosaicgrid.js

767 ms

head1_1920x130.png

head1_1920x130.png

231 ms

Polymar_logo_100H.png

Polymar_logo_100H.png

114 ms

building1w_1920x800.jpg

building1w_1920x800.jpg

327 ms

airbus_v2_1920x800.jpg

airbus_v2_1920x800.jpg

292 ms

Humvee_w.jpg

Humvee_w.jpg

386 ms

building1H_1920x800.jpg

building1H_1920x800.jpg

446 ms

Humvee.jpg

Humvee.jpg

465 ms

EdgeSeal_v3.jpg

EdgeSeal_v3.jpg

675 ms

Polyflex_logo.jpg

Polyflex_logo.jpg

382 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

362 ms

Accessibility Review

polymar.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

polymar.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

polymar.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polymar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polymar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

polymar.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polymar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: