Tools & Wizards About Us
postele.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 73% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

postele.co

チャートギャラリー スタンダード Windows対応｜レビュー口コミ評判評価感想詳細｜パンローリングファンサイト

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

241 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

201 ms

postele.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Postele content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about postele.co

チャートギャラリー スタンダード Windows対応｜レビュー口コミ評判評価感想詳細｜パンローリングファンサイト【本日限定】お得な最新情報が手に入ります！是非、ブックマーク(お気に入り)に入れておいてください。

Visit postele.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Postele.co page load time and found that the first response time was 241 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

postele.co performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,660 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.109

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ww38.postele.co

241 ms

caf.js

31 ms

style.css

120 ms

style.css

139 ms

css

140 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Postele.co, 31% (4 requests) were made to D1lxhc4jvstzrp.cloudfront.net and 15% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (376 ms) relates to the external source C.parkingcrew.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 251.3 kB (74%)

Content Size

340.6 kB

After Optimization

89.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Postele.co main page is 340.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 318.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 20.4 kB
  • After minification 20.2 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 235.6 kB

  • Original 318.5 kB
  • After minification 270.6 kB
  • After compression 82.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 235.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 991 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 769 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Postele.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 991 B or 56% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (55%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Postele. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ww38.postele.co

ww38.postele.co

241 ms

caf.js

caf.js

31 ms

style.css

style.css

120 ms

style.css

style.css

139 ms

css

css

140 ms

sale_form.js

sale_form.js

376 ms

js3caf.js

js3caf.js

139 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

22 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

78 ms

iframe.html

iframe.html

47 ms

ads

ads

114 ms

caf.js

caf.js

22 ms

css

css

194 ms

Accessibility Review

postele.co accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

postele.co best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

postele.co SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Postele.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Postele.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

postele.co

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Postele. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: