1.1 sec in total
252 ms
664 ms
138 ms
Welcome to prayervision.com homepage info - get ready to check Prayervision best content right away, or after learning these important things about prayervision.com
Robert Woeger - Official Website
Visit prayervision.comWe analyzed Prayervision.com page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 802 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
prayervision.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value430 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
252 ms
6 ms
54 ms
88 ms
92 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Prayervision.com, 24% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (5 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (252 ms) belongs to the original domain Prayervision.com.
Page size can be reduced by 303.7 kB (72%)
419.1 kB
115.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Prayervision.com main page is 419.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 364.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Prayervision images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 264.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 264.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Prayervision.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (79%)
29
6
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Prayervision. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
prayervision.com
252 ms
webfont.js
6 ms
54 ms
css
88 ms
css
92 ms
css
100 ms
58 ms
56 ms
59 ms
gprofiles.js
89 ms
wpgroho.js
54 ms
54 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
90 ms
w.js
45 ms
css
60 ms
global-print.css
11 ms
erE3KsIWUumgD1j_Ca-V-z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
5 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ1xa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
7 ms
ByLA_FLEa-16SpQuTcQn4NIh4imgI8P11RFo6YPCPC0.woff
176 ms
9Z3uUWMRR7crzm1TjRicDoUt79146ZFaIJxILcpzmhI.woff
177 ms
orange-medium.png
146 ms
px.gif
101 ms
98 ms
hovercard.css
84 ms
services.css
86 ms
count.json
77 ms
g.gif
65 ms
graph.facebook.com
125 ms
px.gif
53 ms
g.gif
53 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
82 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
89 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
90 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
89 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
88 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
87 ms
Genericons.svg
49 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
20 ms
g.gif
45 ms
g.gif
46 ms
g.gif
45 ms
prayervision.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
prayervision.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
prayervision.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Prayervision.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Prayervision.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
prayervision.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Prayervision. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: