3.3 sec in total
294 ms
2.5 sec
497 ms
Click here to check amazing Preigo content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about preigo.com
“Top
Visit preigo.comWe analyzed Preigo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
preigo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.2 s
0/100
10%
Value27.8 s
0/100
25%
Value23.7 s
0/100
10%
Value860 ms
33/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value24.7 s
0/100
10%
294 ms
426 ms
25 ms
439 ms
584 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Preigo.com, 22% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (965 ms) belongs to the original domain Preigo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (36%)
2.8 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Preigo.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Preigo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 290.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 290.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 625.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Preigo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 625.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (27%)
60
44
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Preigo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
preigo.com
294 ms
www.preigo.com
426 ms
css
25 ms
bootstrap.css
439 ms
style.css
584 ms
dark.css
298 ms
font-icons.css
294 ms
animate.css
372 ms
magnific-popup.css
216 ms
responsive.css
367 ms
jquery.js
513 ms
plugins.js
802 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
598 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
598 ms
settings.css
965 ms
functions.js
521 ms
css
17 ms
css
22 ms
css
23 ms
css
23 ms
logo.png
77 ms
logo@2x.png
76 ms
s3-bg.jpg
172 ms
s4.jpg
170 ms
s2-1.png
445 ms
s2-2.png
453 ms
s2-3.png
454 ms
s2-4.png
452 ms
s2-5.png
455 ms
s2-6.png
445 ms
s2-7.png
455 ms
s2-8.png
453 ms
s5.jpg
510 ms
logo-dark.png
336 ms
websites.gif
390 ms
mobile.gif
388 ms
ecommerce.gif
611 ms
applications.gif
337 ms
design.gif
419 ms
social_meadia.gif
468 ms
2.jpg
411 ms
1.jpg
412 ms
3.jpg
447 ms
amadeus.png
480 ms
asianet.png
482 ms
hyundai.png
496 ms
jaihind.png
541 ms
kasper.png
541 ms
mwnf.png
554 ms
nest.png
555 ms
pwd.png
567 ms
SCTA.png
591 ms
toonz.png
611 ms
logowhite_new.png
625 ms
home_parallax.jpg
810 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
42 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
43 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
275 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
276 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
275 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
277 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
276 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
275 ms
font-icons.woff
760 ms
lined-icons.woff
619 ms
QQT_AUSp4AV4dpJfIN7U5FwRGS1J0uDbqVT85dREjI0.ttf
275 ms
n6RTCDcIPWSE8UNBa4k-DLGMqOskSJahibCG-vhG9Ug.ttf
276 ms
5Ywdce7XEbTSbxs__4X1_AzXKzPdQ5IRTaDVrbjtIFE.ttf
276 ms
8XtYtNKEyyZh481XVWfVOqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
277 ms
world-map.png
627 ms
widget-link-dark.png
627 ms
guC5lwT5Dw7anV_xfpCGqw.ttf
224 ms
obisuY-MenYRAFwd-r2NhfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
224 ms
0b3R8ORT0i9mlMGM3BxXF_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
226 ms
URSgP3aplSko3CQAzdXHwPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
224 ms
Luunk03-uSz9LnB7oNEUuvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
225 ms
T4JvHtpMHbjlr73o1YLMo_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
224 ms
loader.gif
382 ms
timer.png
420 ms
preloader.gif
433 ms
revicons.woff
382 ms
s5-thumb.jpg
88 ms
s4-thumb.jpg
132 ms
preigo.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
preigo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
preigo.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Preigo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Preigo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
preigo.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Preigo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: