7.1 sec in total
569 ms
6.4 sec
192 ms
Visit pressa-rf.ru now to see the best up-to-date Pressa Rf content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pressa-rf.ru
???????????? ??????? ?????? ?????? - ?????? ??? ?????????? ???????? ?? ??????? ? ?????? ?? 2024 - 2023 ???. ??????????? ? ???????? ??????? ? ????????? ?????? ?????? ? ????????.
Visit pressa-rf.ruWe analyzed Pressa-rf.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 569 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
pressa-rf.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value1,620 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
569 ms
1486 ms
326 ms
789 ms
362 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Pressa-rf.ru, 7% (6 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 5% (4 requests) were made to W.uptolike.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pressa-rf.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 184.1 kB (62%)
297.5 kB
113.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Pressa-rf.ru main page is 297.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 201.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pressa Rf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 124.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.3 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pressa-rf.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (66%)
80
27
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pressa Rf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
pressa-rf.ru
569 ms
www.pressa-rf.ru
1486 ms
style.css
326 ms
jquery.js
789 ms
lightbox.js
362 ms
function.js
360 ms
zp.js
693 ms
bktopicon.gif
193 ms
ic6.gif
1483 ms
7.gif
313 ms
8.gif
317 ms
9.gif
320 ms
logo.gif
558 ms
bktopsrch.gif
378 ms
srchplate.gif
639 ms
bktopsrchend.gif
626 ms
bsearch.gif
638 ms
bklogin.gif
684 ms
benter.gif
738 ms
bklcol.gif
867 ms
bklmenu.gif
933 ms
lmpoint.gif
1007 ms
bklme.gif
1006 ms
bklogos.gif
1047 ms
lg_aif.gif
1109 ms
0.gif
1183 ms
lg_knigas.gif
1248 ms
lg_arzi.gif
1375 ms
lg_apr.gif
1377 ms
lg_kp.gif
1356 ms
lg_eg.gif
1417 ms
lg_bibkom.gif
1544 ms
clmn_bkhdr.gif
1555 ms
11_thumbnail.jpg
1843 ms
isubs.gif
1691 ms
dlv_h.gif
1713 ms
12_thumbnail.jpg
1736 ms
clmn_ftr.gif
1868 ms
bkccol.gif
1906 ms
coll_1.gif
1999 ms
pressarus.gif
2031 ms
coll_2-1.jpg
2042 ms
ib_quest.gif
2217 ms
ib_end.gif
2237 ms
ic7.gif
1471 ms
top100.cnt
317 ms
banner-88x31-rambler-green2.gif
318 ms
hit
334 ms
ga.js
28 ms
watch.js
167 ms
watch.js
460 ms
impression.html
317 ms
sync
256 ms
extra.js
375 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
point1.gif
2060 ms
watch.js
423 ms
imore.gif
2016 ms
is_btn.gif
2061 ms
ibb_subs.gif
2092 ms
ibb_end.gif
2166 ms
pixel
17 ms
375 ms
match
196 ms
pixel
15 ms
advert.gif
172 ms
subsrch_l.gif
2031 ms
1
104 ms
subsrch_r.gif
1992 ms
bsubsrch.gif
2003 ms
tpkhdr_l.gif
2053 ms
tpkhdr_r.gif
2092 ms
27008286
91 ms
btpksrch.gif
2115 ms
tpkpoint.gif
2037 ms
tpkbug_l.gif
1994 ms
tpkbug_r.gif
2000 ms
coll_3-1.gif
2327 ms
15_thumbnail.jpg
2211 ms
support.html
189 ms
7_thumbnail.jpg
2060 ms
8_thumbnail.jpg
2027 ms
bkb_left.gif
1988 ms
bkb_bk.gif
2009 ms
bkb_cntr.gif
2113 ms
bkbtmcntend.gif
2146 ms
promoting.gif
2172 ms
bkb_right.gif
2078 ms
pressa-rf.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
pressa-rf.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pressa-rf.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pressa-rf.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pressa-rf.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
pressa-rf.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pressa Rf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: