3.4 sec in total
497 ms
2.4 sec
527 ms
Click here to check amazing Printonic content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about printonic.ru
картинки и раскраски для детей.
Visit printonic.ruWe analyzed Printonic.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 497 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
printonic.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value5.8 s
16/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value280 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.071
96/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
497 ms
26 ms
97 ms
285 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Printonic.ru, 7% (5 requests) were made to Share.pluso.ru and 5% (4 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (926 ms) belongs to the original domain Printonic.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 365.7 kB (33%)
1.1 MB
737.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Printonic.ru main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 674.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Printonic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 56.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 219.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Printonic.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 219.6 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (32%)
68
46
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Printonic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
printonic.ru
497 ms
css
26 ms
styles.css
97 ms
jquery.min.js
285 ms
jquery.ba-bbq.min.js
194 ms
styles.css
387 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
196 ms
flexnav.css
197 ms
modernizr.custom.js
199 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js
303 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.min.js
300 ms
jquery.lavalamp-1.4.min.js
301 ms
jquery.flexnav.min.js
302 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
371 ms
scripts.js
424 ms
jquery.yiilistview.js
424 ms
pattern_1_left_top_bg.png
99 ms
pattern_1_right_top_bg.png
98 ms
social-icons.png
99 ms
logo-2.png
97 ms
top_content_head_bg.png
101 ms
top_content_footer_bg.png
98 ms
bg_bottom_content.png
471 ms
gallery_container_bg.png
217 ms
thumb_img_56a33cfad5869_resize_0_215.jpg
214 ms
thumb_img_56a34d9761e2b_resize_0_215.jpg
213 ms
thumb_img_567bcc17d25f9_resize_0_215.jpg
311 ms
thumb_img_56a33cc4e6a5c_resize_0_215.jpg
203 ms
thumb_img_56c6c5a7645fe_resize_0_215.jpg
399 ms
thumb_img_56cae725a908e_resize_0_215.jpg
311 ms
thumb_img_56a3495dee6c2_resize_0_215.jpg
311 ms
thumb_img_56a33b875bfd8_resize_0_215.jpg
314 ms
thumb_img_567986f55d917_resize_0_215.jpg
416 ms
thumb_img_56a349317a3c9_resize_0_215.jpg
417 ms
thumb_img_56a27fb3b0ba3_resize_0_215.jpg
429 ms
thumb_img_567bc60e6da4b_resize_0_215.jpg
431 ms
thumb_img_56cac4213519a_resize_0_215.jpg
594 ms
thumb_img_56cab697f1a58_resize_0_215.jpg
608 ms
thumb_img_56e658799ea95_resize_0_215.jpg
609 ms
thumb_img_56cae28e21c93_resize_0_215.jpg
621 ms
thumb_img_56d5834ee1bd6_resize_0_215.jpg
545 ms
thumb_img_56d57fb63cdf8_resize_0_215.jpg
564 ms
thumb_img_56e65c1ada603_resize_0_215.jpg
641 ms
thumb_img_56cae37d4afc9_resize_0_215.jpg
657 ms
thumb_img_56d5818bbadb8_resize_0_215.jpg
692 ms
thumb_img_56e660ceb4690_resize_0_215.jpg
703 ms
thumb_img_56cab6fb5e1f4_resize_0_215.jpg
720 ms
thumb_img_56e661507f3e7_resize_0_215.jpg
722 ms
pattern_1_left_bg.png
926 ms
hit
263 ms
pattern_1_right_bg.png
826 ms
BAErcm-yHtTwg73NDhvJwg.ttf
49 ms
8Hj8G_JpSADPYrRpzMno2i3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
51 ms
watch.js
478 ms
pluso-like.js
266 ms
picture_icon.png
721 ms
to_top_button_bg.png
731 ms
hit
127 ms
advert.gif
92 ms
1
92 ms
14.png
261 ms
process
269 ms
process
270 ms
hit;PLUSO
258 ms
plus.png
259 ms
kb.js
283 ms
collect_pluso.js
199 ms
hit;PLUSO
152 ms
crossd_pluso_iframe.html
111 ms
dct.js
152 ms
h.gif
142 ms
s.js
278 ms
3696d9c5412d7dbcbaf1f52aba44c40f
80 ms
printonic.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
printonic.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
printonic.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Printonic.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Printonic.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
printonic.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Printonic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: