3.3 sec in total
178 ms
2.1 sec
999 ms
Welcome to privacy.com homepage info - get ready to check Privacy best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about privacy.com
Protect your payment security. Shield your financial information and protect against credit and debit card fraud with secure, randomly-generated virtual card numbers.
Visit privacy.comWe analyzed Privacy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
privacy.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.0 s
0/100
10%
Value11.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value1,620 ms
12/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
178 ms
274 ms
197 ms
34 ms
439 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Privacy.com, 18% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Privacy.com.
Page size can be reduced by 41.4 kB (9%)
451.3 kB
409.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Privacy.com main page is 451.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 398.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
We found no issues to fix!
25
25
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Privacy. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
privacy.com
178 ms
privacy.com
274 ms
d765a39f.app.css
197 ms
css
34 ms
fef50d87.vendor.js
439 ms
cdfbb210.app.js
373 ms
zxcvbn.js
1088 ms
openEnrollment
306 ms
ph-featured-techcrunch-wordmark.svg
113 ms
ph-featured-theverge.svg
111 ms
phone-20.svg
101 ms
tick-20.svg
98 ms
brand-apple-20.svg
270 ms
brand-android-20.svg
280 ms
hamburger-20.svg
254 ms
single-iphone.png
375 ms
iphones.png
376 ms
features-secure-lock.svg
255 ms
avatar-gavicoind.png
374 ms
avatar-derousse.png
374 ms
avatar-bitandbang.png
523 ms
avatar-awslattery.png
523 ms
logo-20-white.svg
454 ms
controls-win.png
465 ms
features-landing-trash.png
464 ms
features-landing-everlane-card.png
464 ms
button-loading-spinner.png
523 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
46 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
101 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
123 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
124 ms
hMqPNLsu_dywMa4C_DEpY50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
123 ms
N4duVc9C58uwPiY8_59Fz7fB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
122 ms
wesfy-black_s-webfont.woff
159 ms
privacy.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
privacy.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
privacy.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Privacy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Privacy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
privacy.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Privacy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: